2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic hourly solar forecasting using machine learning models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
71
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive review of applications of deep learning approaches on machine health monitoring tasks is presented in [11]. Machine learning for hourly solar forecasting application is proposed in [12]. Reference [13] reviews the ML models that are used for condition monitoring in wind turbines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive review of applications of deep learning approaches on machine health monitoring tasks is presented in [11]. Machine learning for hourly solar forecasting application is proposed in [12]. Reference [13] reviews the ML models that are used for condition monitoring in wind turbines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods can be roughly divided into three categories: the numerical weather prediction (NWP), the image-based technique, and the statistical methods. NWP methods generate solar irradiance with hundreds of meteorological parameters [4]; It is a versatile approach for 6-48-h-ahead forecasting [5]. However, NWP model is based on dynamic equations of the atmospheric states computed with a fixed resolution, usually at the regional and national scale, not site-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning has a strong nonlinear fitting capability, but at the same time, it has higher requirements for data volume. An overview of machine learning-based solar forecasting approaches has been provided in the literature [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model with 15 min data showed superior performance (MAPE of 1.8852%) compared to other cases and models. Yagli et al (2019) evaluated the performance of 68 ML algorithms for three sky conditions, seven locations, and five different climate zones. All algorithms implemented without any modifications for a fair comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%