2014
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2014.2308011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Identification of Large Fragments in a Pile of Broken Rock Using a Time-of-Flight Camera

Abstract: This paper presents a solution to part of the problem of making robotic or semi-robotic digging equipment less dependant on human supervision. A method is described for identifying rocks of a certain size that may affect digging efficiency or require special handling. The process involves three main steps. First, by using range and intensity data from a time-of-flight (TOF) camera, a feature descriptor is used to rank points and separate regions surrounding high scoring points. This allows a wide range of rock… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size distribution of blasting products can only be measured accurately enough by sieving the muckpile, a complicated, costly and disruptive to production task. Although enhanced 2D technologies (often called 3D though they are not really determining fragmentation of a rock volume) to monitor fragmentation are available, such as LiDAR imaging-laser imaging detection and ranging (McKinnon and Marshall 2014;Oñederra et al 2015;Thurley 2013;Thurley et al 2015) or photogrammetry (Noy 2013(Noy , 2015Bamford et al 2016), 2D image analysis is still the most common tool used. Image analysis systems may show a poor performance at small sizes especially when they have not been calibrated (Sanchidrián et al 2009) and it is advisable to use additional tools to correct raw data on a blast per blast basis in order to get a good estimation of the actual size distribution (Sanchidrián et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size distribution of blasting products can only be measured accurately enough by sieving the muckpile, a complicated, costly and disruptive to production task. Although enhanced 2D technologies (often called 3D though they are not really determining fragmentation of a rock volume) to monitor fragmentation are available, such as LiDAR imaging-laser imaging detection and ranging (McKinnon and Marshall 2014;Oñederra et al 2015;Thurley 2013;Thurley et al 2015) or photogrammetry (Noy 2013(Noy , 2015Bamford et al 2016), 2D image analysis is still the most common tool used. Image analysis systems may show a poor performance at small sizes especially when they have not been calibrated (Sanchidrián et al 2009) and it is advisable to use additional tools to correct raw data on a blast per blast basis in order to get a good estimation of the actual size distribution (Sanchidrián et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industrial vision systems play a role of 'electronic eyes' in factories. Besides, imaging-based automatic inspection is involved also in process control and robot guidance (McKinnon and Marshall 2014). The examples of visual inspection systems include verification of quality dimensional characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: Machine Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate and frequent information is needed to ensure design specifications are met and equipment is operating at optimal levels. Current rock size (fragmentation) estimation technologies use exteroceptive sensors (e.g., cameras, LiDAR) [6], [7]. Drawbacks to these sensors are that they are only able to see the surface of a rock pile, cameras require specific lighting conditions and positioning, and significant time to safely acquire the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%