2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-010-0650-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic image semantic interpretation using social action and tagging data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and have posted queries as the following with max weight (5) with weight (4) these annotations are to be more convenient to be used as indexing due to its weight factor and by socializing it to other clients like the highest effective annotations will be , This is for the same URL. will be indexed using key {race, fancy, celebrity and sport .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…and have posted queries as the following with max weight (5) with weight (4) these annotations are to be more convenient to be used as indexing due to its weight factor and by socializing it to other clients like the highest effective annotations will be , This is for the same URL. will be indexed using key {race, fancy, celebrity and sport .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AIM project can be integrated with what we are presenting to provide consistent ontological environment for image retrieval and annotations. The same annotation context is presented by [7] and [4] but both depend on the retrieval and extraction of knowledge from the resources available on the global net.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Content analysis was then introduced to complement metadata in clustering photos: colour analysis and time to detect a scene and mark an event (Platt et al 2003, Cooper et al 2005; content analysis and GPS information to automatically identify relevant buildings (O'Hare et al 2005); and face recognition to organize personal photos into albums (Zhang et al 2005). This trend of enriching metadata has expanded to include other contextual information such as weather conditions (Naaman 2004), movement detection (to detect walking or standing via accelerometer data in a SenseCam (Qui et al 2011)), tags and social use (Sawant et al 2011). All these techniques performed well in lab evaluations, but studies in the home show that people do not use photo systems to organize their collections and often fail when retrieving .…”
Section: Systems For Capturing Organising and Retrieving Photosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images are provided with the Flickr community's annotations, which sets this database apart from the previously mentioned. The annotations are of lower quality because they come from a large uncontrolled group of people (social tagging [22]), but they are abundant. Both the high quality of the photographs and the social tagging made us choose this database.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%