2016 Ninth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ic3.2016.7880227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic imaging method for optic disc segmentation using morphological techniques and active contour fitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table III and Table IV discussed performance of the proposed GlaucoNet+ model with different classification setups (Table III) and configuration (Table IV); however to further examine efficacy of our proposed model in comparison to the other existing glaucoma detection and classification methods, we have performed analysis based on secondary resources (reviewing existing methods or allied papers). [49] 84.38 --- [54] 95.50 --- [60] --- [64] 88.00 --- [35] --98.60 - [36] 99.20 -86.00 - [65] ---- [47] 80.00 -95.00 - [48] 97.00 --- [57] 98 --- [39] 94.10 -91.80 - [75] 90.00 --- [40] --92.00 - [33] 100.00 -94.00 - [59] ---- [66] 89.6 (NB) 97.6(AN N) --- [67] 92.00 --- [68] ---- [69] 72.38 --- [70] 79.00 -87.00 - [71] 83.10 --- [62] 93.00 --- [72] 96.67 -100.00 - [73] 91.00 --- [74] 92.00 --- [4] 0.8478 - [55] 88. Observing the results, it can be found that the proposed GlaucoNet+ model with Hybrid feature extraction and SVM (polynomial) with 10-fold cross validation outperforms major existing approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table III and Table IV discussed performance of the proposed GlaucoNet+ model with different classification setups (Table III) and configuration (Table IV); however to further examine efficacy of our proposed model in comparison to the other existing glaucoma detection and classification methods, we have performed analysis based on secondary resources (reviewing existing methods or allied papers). [49] 84.38 --- [54] 95.50 --- [60] --- [64] 88.00 --- [35] --98.60 - [36] 99.20 -86.00 - [65] ---- [47] 80.00 -95.00 - [48] 97.00 --- [57] 98 --- [39] 94.10 -91.80 - [75] 90.00 --- [40] --92.00 - [33] 100.00 -94.00 - [59] ---- [66] 89.6 (NB) 97.6(AN N) --- [67] 92.00 --- [68] ---- [69] 72.38 --- [70] 79.00 -87.00 - [71] 83.10 --- [62] 93.00 --- [72] 96.67 -100.00 - [73] 91.00 --- [74] 92.00 --- [4] 0.8478 - [55] 88. Observing the results, it can be found that the proposed GlaucoNet+ model with Hybrid feature extraction and SVM (polynomial) with 10-fold cross validation outperforms major existing approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bock et al [6] calculated Glaucoma Risk Index (GRI) from the pre-processed image with the use of the probabilistic two-stage scheme. Agarwal et al [4] implemented classic morphological operations iteratively followed by active contour fitting for the precise segmentation of the optic disc. Issac et al [26] utilized the concept of super pixels for the removal of false positives followed by the analysis of geometrical features to accurately segment out the optic disc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optic disc is segmented as an elevated structure possessing the fine retinal vessels and nerve endings [34]. Contour of each and every fine structure in the image is described through geometric or geodesic active contours [7,29]. This property of the active contour model can be used more effectively in 3-D image construction and mapping.…”
Section: Geometric or Geodesic Active Contour Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%