2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2012
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2012.6352681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic landslide recognition through Optimum-Path Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "object-oriented" approach, however, groups image pixels into homogeneous objects, with shape, size, neighboring, and textural features in addition to spectral information (Aksoy et al, 2012). With both approaches, supervised and unsupervised classification schemes have been adopted, based on algorithms such as maximum likelihood (Nichol et al, 2005;Borghuis et al, 2007;Danneels et al, 2007), K nearest neighbor (Cheng et al, 2013;Li et al, 2013), artificial neural networks (Nichol et al, 2005;Danneels et al, 2007;Moosavi et al, 2014), random forests (Stumpf et al, 2011(Stumpf et al, , 2014, or support vector machines (SVMs; Pisani et al, 2012;Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2012;Moosavi et al, 2014). Novel object-based approaches for automated landslide mapping include the classification of different landslide types (Martha et al, 2010), identification of landslides from panchromatic imagery only through strong reliance on texture measures , or the detection and mapping of forested landslides resorting to lidar data (Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2012).…”
Section: Automated Methods For Landslide Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "object-oriented" approach, however, groups image pixels into homogeneous objects, with shape, size, neighboring, and textural features in addition to spectral information (Aksoy et al, 2012). With both approaches, supervised and unsupervised classification schemes have been adopted, based on algorithms such as maximum likelihood (Nichol et al, 2005;Borghuis et al, 2007;Danneels et al, 2007), K nearest neighbor (Cheng et al, 2013;Li et al, 2013), artificial neural networks (Nichol et al, 2005;Danneels et al, 2007;Moosavi et al, 2014), random forests (Stumpf et al, 2011(Stumpf et al, , 2014, or support vector machines (SVMs; Pisani et al, 2012;Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2012;Moosavi et al, 2014). Novel object-based approaches for automated landslide mapping include the classification of different landslide types (Martha et al, 2010), identification of landslides from panchromatic imagery only through strong reliance on texture measures , or the detection and mapping of forested landslides resorting to lidar data (Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2012).…”
Section: Automated Methods For Landslide Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freitas et al [32] estimated rainfall in agricultural areas using GOES satellite weather images, and compared OPF classifiers with SVM, ANN-MLP, and K-NN, with OPF demonstrating a superior runtime. OPF recognized collapsed areas from GeoEye-MS satellite imagery, yielding results similar to cutting-edge techniques [33]. Papa et al [54], proposed a method combining the OPF classifier with three optimization algorithms (PSO, HS, and GSA) to mitigate the problem of reducing hyperspectral image data through band selection.…”
Section: Opf Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the spatial variability of spectral signatures, the extraction of hyperspectral image characteristics is widely recognized as one of the most challenging tasks in processing hyperspectral images [29] [33], which involves the experience of specialists. Gabor filters [34], adaptive filters [35], and Markov chains [36] are often adopted.…”
Section: Use Of Remote Sensing Data To Identify Geometric Features Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "object-oriented" approach, however, groups image pixels into homogeneous objects, with shape, size, neighboring, and textural features in addition to spectral information (Aksoy et al, 2012). With both approaches, supervised and unsupervised classification schemes have been adopted, based on algorithms such as maximum likelihood (Nichol et al, 2005;Borghuis et al, 2007;Danneels et al, 2007), K nearest neighbor (Cheng et al, 2013;Li et al, 2013), artificial neural networks (Nichol et al, 2005;Danneels et al, 2007;Moosavi et al, 2014), random forests , or support vector machines (SVMs; Pisani et al, 2012;Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2012;Moosavi et al, 2014). Novel object-based approaches for automated landslide mapping include the classification of different landslide types (Martha et al, 2010), identification of landslides from panchromatic imagery only through strong reliance on texture measures , or the detection and mapping of forested landslides resorting to lidar data (Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2012).…”
Section: Automated Methods For Landslide Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%