2005
DOI: 10.1007/11539087_135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Liver Segmentation of Contrast Enhanced CT Images Based on Histogram Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AER was used as an established tool for validating the segmentation accuracy. Our results are in accordance with the studies of Ciecholewski [10], who tested the ACM on ultrasound images to extract the shape of the gallbladder, and studies carried out by Seo et al [31] on the automatic segmentation of the liver using computed tomography images. In both papers, the AER is used as an evaluation criterion of the performances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The AER was used as an established tool for validating the segmentation accuracy. Our results are in accordance with the studies of Ciecholewski [10], who tested the ACM on ultrasound images to extract the shape of the gallbladder, and studies carried out by Seo et al [31] on the automatic segmentation of the liver using computed tomography images. In both papers, the AER is used as an evaluation criterion of the performances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although many works have been produced since the nineties, especially in CT, the variance in liver size and shape between the patients and the proximity with other organs of similar intensity make automatic liver segmentation especially difficult( [6], [7]). We have to add to this situation the inherent problems to magnetic resonance images, such as the lack of homogeneity in the radiated magnetic field and the artefacts of the coils.…”
Section: Motwationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, liver segmentation in 3D CT image can be grouped as prior-model-based approaches 3,4,[12][13][14][15] and image-data-driven approaches. [5][6][7][16][17][18][19] The first group, modelbased segmentation, is a global approach that matches a prior model into the target image. Popular methods for construction of prior models are statistical shape model (SSM) 3,14,20,21 and (probabilistic) atlas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used methods include thresholding, 18 region growing, 19 deformable model-based approaches/variational energy minimization, 5,8 fast marching, 17 graph cuts, 7,9 and so on. Leakage on weak edges is one of the biggest challenges for methods in this class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%