2015
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic methods for long-term tracking and the detection and decoding of communication dances in honeybees

Abstract: Automatic methods for long-term tracking and the detection and decoding of communication dances in honeybees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A decoder DCNN trained on this data outperforms decoders trained on various baselines. Compared to the previously used non-neural algorithm (Wario et al, 2015) RenderGAN improved the decoding accuracy significantly. Consequently the downstream tracking process that links detections through time improved in several respects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A decoder DCNN trained on this data outperforms decoders trained on various baselines. Compared to the previously used non-neural algorithm (Wario et al, 2015) RenderGAN improved the decoding accuracy significantly. Consequently the downstream tracking process that links detections through time improved in several respects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The previous BeesBook vision system (Wario et al, 2015) was tailored to specifically track all animals of small honeybee colonies over their entire lifetime. It uses a round and curved marker and searches for ellipse-shaped edge formations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing a broad set of insightful tools, only highly integrated research on novel systems leads to a meaningful design method for hybrid societies. Prime examples of successful integration of methods are the integration of robots and fish (Marras and Porfiri, 2012) and the automatic analysis of social networks in honeybees (Wario et al, 2015). Again, establishing such a deep understanding of the other field requires time.…”
Section: Secondary Challenge: Integration Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural honey bee colony contains a high density of visually similar members, rapidly moving and occluding on the uneven and changing honeycomb surface, and whose numbers change in time. These factors present substantial difficulties for automated image analysis for which a common solution is to apply physical tags to some 8 or most 9,10 of the colony members. Barcoded tags allow for the distinct marking of a sufficiently large number of individuals to track a naturally-sized colony and have been exploited to unravel important aspects of bee communication 8,11 and information spread 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the burden of manually tagging hundreds or thousands of small insects, without harm or inhibition to their motion, carries severe limitations. For example, marking newly hatched bees requires either opening the hive or introducing marked newborns without letting any hatch inside, both of which disrupt the colony 9,11 . Moreover, the recognition of markers fails when the tag is partially occluded or blurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%