2023
DOI: 10.3390/e25020318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Modulation Classification for Underwater Acoustic Communication Signals Based on Deep Complex Networks

Abstract: Automatic modulation classification (AMC) is an important method for monitoring and identifying any underwater communication interference. Since the underwater acoustic communication scenario is full of multi-path fading and ocean ambient noise (OAN), coupled with the application of modern communication technology, which is usually susceptible to environmental influences, automatic modulation classification (AMC) becomes particularly difficult when it comes to an underwater scenario. Motivated by the deep comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed AMC method based on GCN, we compared the performance of the proposed method with those state-of-the-art AMC methods. The achieved methods include deep learning methods (basic CNN [44], InceptionV3 [45], GAN [29], VGGnet [30], ResNet [46,47], LSTM [48,49], deep complex network (DCN) [1]), and feature extraction methods (HOC [3,4] using an SVM classifier, CS [50] with a neural network classifier, and continuous wavelet transform (CWT) [11,51] with an SVM classifier). We carried out the comparison experiments in Ch1 and Ch2, respectively.…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Influence Of The Different Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed AMC method based on GCN, we compared the performance of the proposed method with those state-of-the-art AMC methods. The achieved methods include deep learning methods (basic CNN [44], InceptionV3 [45], GAN [29], VGGnet [30], ResNet [46,47], LSTM [48,49], deep complex network (DCN) [1]), and feature extraction methods (HOC [3,4] using an SVM classifier, CS [50] with a neural network classifier, and continuous wavelet transform (CWT) [11,51] with an SVM classifier). We carried out the comparison experiments in Ch1 and Ch2, respectively.…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Influence Of The Different Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we could not only accelerate computational speed but also integrate the feature extraction process and forward propagation of the GCN into one computational framework. We compared our proposed method with DCN in our previous work [1]. Figure 16 shows the computational cost comparison of different methods-GCN1 denotes the process of the first step without GPU acceleration and GCN2 denotes the process of the first step with GPU acceleration.…”
Section: Computational Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Traditional methods of underwater acoustic target feature extraction can be categorized into signal physics-based and brainlike computing methods (Zhu et al, 2023). Signal physics-based methods rely on basic characteristics, temporal features, and non-Gaussian characteristics of underwater acoustic signals (Yao X. et al, 2023). This includes time-domain features like zero-crossing distribution, frequency-domain features like cepstral analysis (Zhu et al, 2022), and joint time-frequency domain features such as wavelet transforms (Han et al, 2022;Tian et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%