2002
DOI: 10.1007/s580-002-8082-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic On-Line Analysis Of Milk Constituents (Urea, Ketones, Enzymes And Hormones) Using Biosensors

Abstract: Traditional methods of monitoring health changes in animals are based entirely on the human senses. However, in modern dairy production systems humans are rarely present, this is particularly the case with the introduction of robotic milking. In these systems all the functions of milking are automated and cows visit at times of their own choosing. Systems of automatic health monitoring are therefore a priority for research to ensure that the health and reproductive status of the animals can be assessed for man… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such metabolic imbalance is likely to be monitored in the future by means of in-line measurements of milk constituents (Mottram et al, 2002;Nielsen et al, 2005) or by small portable analytical devices for on-farm analyses of metabolites in blood (Andersen et al, 2002a;Perkins et al, 2005). It is therefore of interest to use the information from physiological parameters in blood and/or milk to make adjustments in the feeding on a group or individual level, in order to minimise the risk of metabolic diseases (Ingvartsen, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such metabolic imbalance is likely to be monitored in the future by means of in-line measurements of milk constituents (Mottram et al, 2002;Nielsen et al, 2005) or by small portable analytical devices for on-farm analyses of metabolites in blood (Andersen et al, 2002a;Perkins et al, 2005). It is therefore of interest to use the information from physiological parameters in blood and/or milk to make adjustments in the feeding on a group or individual level, in order to minimise the risk of metabolic diseases (Ingvartsen, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milk sample investigation has advantage as non-invasive monitoring Mottram et al, 2002) while investigation of other body fl uids is invasive monitoring which can be associated with sure disadvantages and risks. Milk samples can be attend fast, regularly and cheaply.…”
Section: Milk Ketone Analytical Methods and Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milk samples can be attend fast, regularly and cheaply. That is reason why already previously the various methods with diff erent efectiveness, advantages and disadvantages of ketone determination in milk has been developed (Mottram et al, 2002), from stable tests (relatively cheaper (Geishauser et al, 1997;Hanuš et al, 1999;Carrier et al, 2004)) to direct (colorimetric with salicylaldehyde, with vanillin, fl ow injection analysis with hydroxylamine and gas chromatography, relatively more expensive (O'Moore, 1949;Majewska and Rybczyňska, 1975;Vojtíšek, 1986;Hansen, 1999;Mottram et al, 2002;Heuer et al, 2001;Baticz et al, 2002;Roos et al, 2007;Beran et al, 2012)) and indirect (infrared spectrometry, relatively cheap (Hansen, 1999;Roos et al, 2007;Knegsel et al, 2010;Dri et al, 2012)) laboratory analytical methods. Whole raw of semiquantitative stable tests exists for ketones in urine (for instance Ketophan (Hanuš et al, 2001)) for quick diagnosis but there are only three (Carrier et al, 2004) good usable tests for work with milk.…”
Section: Milk Ketone Analytical Methods and Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Real time analyses of main milk components are attended in milking parlours today. Breeders can know milk composition regularly (Mottram et al, 2002). According to literature sources the milk indicators such as acetone content and fat/crude protein (F/CP) and fat/lactose (F/L) quotient could be successfuly used in the SK diagnosis (Duffi eld et al, 1997;Geishauser and Ziebell, 1995;Steen et al, 1996;Geishauser et al, 1997;Heuer et al, 2001;Reist et al, 2002;Van Knegsel et al, 2010;Siebert and Pallauf, 2010;Manzenreiter et al, 2013;Hanuš et al, 2013).…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%