IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/wi.2007.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Ontology Identification for Reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain candidate words might be associated with more than one concept-word. To avoid introducing ambiguity in the ontology, we pair each candidate word with the associated concept-word with the highest tf * iof weight [1], where iof is a variant of idf that is calculated across our collection of 183 ontologies and increases the weights of tokens that are unique to a particular ontology.…”
Section: Common Hypernyms Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Certain candidate words might be associated with more than one concept-word. To avoid introducing ambiguity in the ontology, we pair each candidate word with the associated concept-word with the highest tf * iof weight [1], where iof is a variant of idf that is calculated across our collection of 183 ontologies and increases the weights of tokens that are unique to a particular ontology.…”
Section: Common Hypernyms Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the lack of automatic tools makes these tasks particularly arduous to non-expert users. In a previous study we investigated [1] the scenario in which the user provides a sample documents related to a topic for which an ontological representation is desired. Using these documents, our approach attempts to select the best-matching domain ontology from a large public library.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%