2011
DOI: 10.1609/icaps.v21i1.13459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Polytime Reductions of NP Problems into a Fragment of STRIPS

Abstract: We present a software tool that is able to automatically translate an NP problem into a STRIPS problem such that the former problem has a solution iff the latter has one, a solution for the latter can be transformed into a solution for the former, and all this can be done efficiently. Moreover, the tool is built such that it only produces problems that belong to a fragment of STRIPS that is solvable in non-deterministic polynomial time, a fact that guarantees that the whole approach is not an overkill. This to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have extended the tool by Porco, Machado, and Bonet (2011) with a type system and over arbitrary SO formulas which capture the class PH: given such a formula Φ over signature σ and a first-order structure A for σ, the tool generates a planning problem P that has solution iff A Φ. Since problems in PH don't have short certificates in general, the solutions for STRIPS problems generally have exponential length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have extended the tool by Porco, Machado, and Bonet (2011) with a type system and over arbitrary SO formulas which capture the class PH: given such a formula Φ over signature σ and a first-order structure A for σ, the tool generates a planning problem P that has solution iff A Φ. Since problems in PH don't have short certificates in general, the solutions for STRIPS problems generally have exponential length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SAT-based planners are inherently incomplete when there is no solution, as they continue the search forever unless an upper bound on the length of the plan is given in advance. 2 Porco , Machado, and Bonet (2011) show how to calculate tight lower and upper bounds l(ψ) and u(ψ) on the number of (parallel) actions needed to prove a first-order sentence ψ once the interpretations of the relational symbols occurring in ψ are fixed. We use such estimates to provide tight lower and upper bounds l * (Φ) and u * (Φ) on the length of parallel plans for SO formulas Φ.…”
Section: Horizon Windows For Sat-based Plannersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An example originating in systems biology is the minimal seed-set problem (Gefen and Brafman 2011), which challenges both classical optimisation methods and optimal planners. Moreover, recent work on translating NP problems into an NP fragment of classical planning opens the possibility that optimal delete-free planning could directly be used to solve a wide range of NP-hard problems (Porco, Machado, and Bonet 2011). Hence practical methods for solving delete-free problems are also important to extend the reach of planning technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%