2018
DOI: 10.3166/ts.35.121-136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic ranking of image thresholding techniques using consensus of ground truth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vieira et al [135] averaged the results of manual thresholding and two algorithms, and estimated the uncertainty of this averaged reference dataset. Panigrahi et al [136] used a similar, although more automated approach. The core idea of this method is to perform multiple segmentations on a single dataset.…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vieira et al [135] averaged the results of manual thresholding and two algorithms, and estimated the uncertainty of this averaged reference dataset. Panigrahi et al [136] used a similar, although more automated approach. The core idea of this method is to perform multiple segmentations on a single dataset.…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is error‐prone, as it relies on human observer scores. Reference [28] rectified this by proposing a novel approach to automatically generate ground truth for image binarization by consensus of different thresholding methods. The authors concluded that F‐measure, modified Hausdorff distance, and edge mismatch error are non‐redundant and distinct indicators and are useful in evaluating the performance of the algorithm on image databases.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D visual images of athletes are traditionally recognized by edge detection algorithms, which capture the significant changes of brightness in the images and improve the amplitude features. Nonetheless, these algorithms cannot achieve efficient and accurate recognition [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%