2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10844-005-0323-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Recognition of Isolated Monophonic Musical Instrument Sounds using kNNC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact validation process used may be different as well. For instance, we used 10-fold cross validation, while Kaminskj and Czaszejko [21] and others used leave-one-out. Paired with a good performance level, the feature dimensionality of our approach is relatively low with the selected feature sets having less than or around 20 dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The exact validation process used may be different as well. For instance, we used 10-fold cross validation, while Kaminskj and Czaszejko [21] and others used leave-one-out. Paired with a good performance level, the feature dimensionality of our approach is relatively low with the selected feature sets having less than or around 20 dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livshin and Rodet [19] used 62 features and selected the best 20 for real-time solo detection. Kaminskj and Czaszejko [21] used 710 dimensions after PCA. In our study, a 5-dimension set after PCA can also achieve a good classification accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kaminskyj and Nielsen [6,7] have used MFCC in a broad series of instrument classification studies. It was demonstrated that, the MFCC based feature scheme gives the best classification performance [4].…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study on taxonomic feature analysis for recognition of classical instruments was described by Deng et al [4]. Though the MFCC of music sound have been proved helpful more than once in the instrument timbre classification [6][7][8], little has been progressed in improving the accuracy rate [8,9]. In general, most classifiers are established on a highly redundant feature set [2,4] instead of an individual feature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%