2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2015.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic reconstruction of parametric building models from indoor point clouds

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe present an automatic approach for the reconstruction of parametric 3D building models from indoor point clouds. While recently developed methods in this domain focus on mere local surface reconstructions which enable e.g. efficient visualization, our approach aims for a volumetric, parametric building model that additionally incorporates contextual information such as global wall connectivity. In contrast to pure surface reconstructions, our representation thereby allows more comprehensive us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
230
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
230
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the detection of permanent structure such as walls, floor and ceiling, we use a method that exploits the topology of planar primitives. Current indoor * Corresponding author reconstruction methods are often limited to Manhattan-World structure (Budroni and Boehm, 2010) or employ horizontal floor/ceiling and vertical wall assumption (Ochmann et al, 2016;Oesau et al, 2014;Xiao and Furukawa, 2014). Other methods generate 2.5D models (Oesau et al, 2014;Turner and Zakhor, 2014) or do not consider the detection of openings and addition of semantics (Mura et al, 2014a;Oesau et al, 2014;Xiao and Furukawa, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the detection of permanent structure such as walls, floor and ceiling, we use a method that exploits the topology of planar primitives. Current indoor * Corresponding author reconstruction methods are often limited to Manhattan-World structure (Budroni and Boehm, 2010) or employ horizontal floor/ceiling and vertical wall assumption (Ochmann et al, 2016;Oesau et al, 2014;Xiao and Furukawa, 2014). Other methods generate 2.5D models (Oesau et al, 2014;Turner and Zakhor, 2014) or do not consider the detection of openings and addition of semantics (Mura et al, 2014a;Oesau et al, 2014;Xiao and Furukawa, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the integration of knowledge is still rare, with few example of hybrid pipelines [83,84]. Our proposed approach constitute a hybrid method inspired by previous work in shape recognition [85][86][87][88], region growing pipelines [80,89,90] and abstraction-based segmentation [91][92][93][94][95] relying on 3D connected component labelling and voxel-based segmentation. As such, different features presented in Table 1 constitute the base for segmentation.…”
Section: Knowledge-based Detection and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the integration of knowledge is still rare, with few example of hybrid pipelines (Ben Hmida et al, 2012;Pu and Vosselman, 2009). Our proposed approach constitute a hybrid method inspired by previous work in shape recognition (Chaperon and Goulette, 2001;Lin et al, 2013;Ochmann et al, 2016;Schnabel et al, 2007), region growing pipelines (Dimitrov and Golparvar-Fard, 2015;Nurunnabi et al, 2012;Rusu and Blodow, 2009) and abstraction-based segmentation (Aijazi et al, 2013;Douillard and Underwood, 2011;Girardeau-Montaut, 2006;Girardeau-Montaut et al, 2005;Samet and Tamminen, 1988) relying on 3D connected component labelling and voxel-based segmentation. Indeed, unstructured point cloud can benefit of structural properties that can be used as part of a segmentation process.…”
Section: Point Cloud Segmentation and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%