2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic reference selection for quantitative EEG interpretation: Identification of diffuse/localised activity and the active earlobe reference, iterative detection of the distribution of EEG rhythms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selecting the proper EEG montage is quite significant for diagnosis as it reveals rhythm indicative of anomalies [25].…”
Section: Eeg Placement/montagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting the proper EEG montage is quite significant for diagnosis as it reveals rhythm indicative of anomalies [25].…”
Section: Eeg Placement/montagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important standardization of EEG studies have took place in 1958 when International Federation of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology approved 10-20% system of electrodes placement offered by Canadian neurophysiologist Herbert Jasper [15]. However neither before nor after no consensus was found on the location of the reference electrode, which would be preferable for EEG recording on the scalp using monopolar montage [5,24,25,28,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much later [31], the use of the following references was discussed: the vertex (Cz), the linked ear and linked mastoid electrodes, ipsilateral or contralateral ears, nose tip, bipolar reference electrodes, the averaged reference (AR), weighted AR, and the reference of source derivation. Each of them has its advantages and disadvantages and can cause various distortions in the topographic pattern of EEG potentials distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%