2014
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2013.868382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Registration of Coastal Remotely Sensed Imagery by Affine Invariant Feature Matching with Shoreline Constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental matrix F can be computed from correspondences between image points alone, without knowledge of camera internal parameters or the relative orientation required. A relatively strict RANSAC tolerance t can remove all of the wrong matches, but also many correct matches; on the contrary, a relatively loose RANSAC threshold may keep more matches, but will not eliminate all the wrong ones [63].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental matrix F can be computed from correspondences between image points alone, without knowledge of camera internal parameters or the relative orientation required. A relatively strict RANSAC tolerance t can remove all of the wrong matches, but also many correct matches; on the contrary, a relatively loose RANSAC threshold may keep more matches, but will not eliminate all the wrong ones [63].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach can be used particularly well to register images of coastal areas. Cheng et al proposed a new approach based on Affine Invariant Feature Matching (AIFM) with a filtering technique is proposed for automatic registration of remotely input image in coastal areas [9] [10]. The novelty of this approach was is an automatic filtering technique using RANdom SAmple Consensus (RANSAC) [11] with shoreline constraint for AIFM to remove all wrong matches and simultaneously keep as many correct matches as possible.…”
Section: Current State Of Problem Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 To prevent the influence of mismatched key points, attempts have been made to combine SIFT with outlier elimination methods 26 , 29 , 30 . Some researchers employed additional datasets, such as digital surface model, 31 stereo image pair, 32 , 33 point and line features, 34 and street view images 35 to extract adequate affine invariant features. Coarse-to-fine methods comprise a preregistration process and a fine-tuning process that employ the advantages of both feature-based and intensity-based methods 10 , 29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%