2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27779-8_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Report Generation from Ontologies: The MIAKT Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of Wilcock's approach [12,11] is that it is fully automatic and does not require a lexicon. A more recent system which generates reports from RDF and DAML ontologies is MIAKT [3]. In contrast to Wilcock's approach, MIAKT [3] requires some manual input (lexicons and domain schemas), but on the other hand it generates more fluent reports, oriented towards end-users, not ontology builders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advantages of Wilcock's approach [12,11] is that it is fully automatic and does not require a lexicon. A more recent system which generates reports from RDF and DAML ontologies is MIAKT [3]. In contrast to Wilcock's approach, MIAKT [3] requires some manual input (lexicons and domain schemas), but on the other hand it generates more fluent reports, oriented towards end-users, not ontology builders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent system which generates reports from RDF and DAML ontologies is MIAKT [3]. In contrast to Wilcock's approach, MIAKT [3] requires some manual input (lexicons and domain schemas), but on the other hand it generates more fluent reports, oriented towards end-users, not ontology builders. It also uses reasoning and the property hierarchy to avoid repetitions, enable more generic text schemas, and perform aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current efforts in NLG have two main focuses. The first one is to provide tools specific oriented to semantic web platforms, and the second one is to design NLG systems that keep the system simple enough to be maintained by non-NLG experts, but without losing quality of the text output ( [32], [33], [34], and [35]). Since I expect that most of the users will not be NLG experts, these proposals can be very useful for the Semantic Web.…”
Section: Knowledge Visualization and Natural Language Generation (Nlg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate the understanding of the information showed by the graphical interface, I decided to integrate ONTOSUM [35], a generator for textual tailored summaries from ontologies. I chose ONTOSUM because is based on a well tested technology [32], it is domain-independent, it is designed for non-NLG experts, and it supports entries in different formal ontology languages like RDF(S), DAML+OIL and OWL.…”
Section: Knowledge Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%