2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11600-017-0015-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic scaling of critical frequency foF2 from ionograms recorded at São José dos Campos, Brazil: a comparison between Autoscala and UDIDA tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I shows the different confidence levels for daytime and nighttime ionograms to evaluate the performance of our method and Autoscala versus the manually scaled results of foF2 [23], [24]. We can see that the proposed method shows good results for the confidence levels from 1.0 to 5.0 with percentages of correct scaled ionograms over 70% for daytime and 60% for nighttime and reaching 94.9% for daytime and 90.1% for nighttime, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Table I shows the different confidence levels for daytime and nighttime ionograms to evaluate the performance of our method and Autoscala versus the manually scaled results of foF2 [23], [24]. We can see that the proposed method shows good results for the confidence levels from 1.0 to 5.0 with percentages of correct scaled ionograms over 70% for daytime and 60% for nighttime and reaching 94.9% for daytime and 90.1% for nighttime, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Different analytical functions have been used to model the topside ionospheric density profile (e.g., exponential, Epstein, Chapman) (Nsumei et al, 2012;Pignalberi et al, 2018a;Reinisch et al, 2007). These functions and their variations may adopt fixed or variable scale height.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UDIDA addressed reducing the manual work in the ionograms by resulting time, frequency versus height information from each ionogram for further processing [5]. Whereas the processed results of UDIDA require fine-tuning, Autoscala results reduce error during specific periods and events [6]. Lynn (2017) proposed a method for ionogram displaying and auto-scaling of F layer [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%