2019
DOI: 10.22266/ijies2019.0831.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Segmentation of Mandibular Cortical Bone on Cone-Beam CT Images Based on Histogram Thresholding and Polynomial Fitting

Abstract: Automatic segmentation of mandibular cortical bone is challenging due to the appearance of teeth that have similar intensity with the bone tissue and the variety of bone intensity. In this paper we propose a new method for automatic segmentation of mandibular cortical bone on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. The bone tissue is segmented by using Gaussian mixture model for histogram thresholding. The mandibular inferior cortical bone is obtained by incorporating several polynomial models to fit the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic methods for bone segmentation are very important in order to get 3D surfaces. It helps surgeons in making correct diagnoses, in performing accurate and quicker VSP and in the evaluation of postoperative follow-up without the influence of surgeon's experience [23][24][25][26][27]. The aim of this study was to evaluate method's accuracy for bone segmentation in CBCT data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic methods for bone segmentation are very important in order to get 3D surfaces. It helps surgeons in making correct diagnoses, in performing accurate and quicker VSP and in the evaluation of postoperative follow-up without the influence of surgeon's experience [23][24][25][26][27]. The aim of this study was to evaluate method's accuracy for bone segmentation in CBCT data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, we compared modified Otsu's thresholding as the automatic marking method with other automatic segmentation methods, which are Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) [24] and Histogram Cluster Analysis (HCA) [25]. GMM and HCA methods are selected to provide equal comparison because the process of automatic marking uses automatic segmentation method that separates the grayscale intensity into four regions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Automatic Marking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GMM models the histogram of grayscale intensity in the image as a mixture of several Gaussian distributions. The mean and standard deviation of each Gaussian distribution will be updated to maximize the likelihood of the graylevels assigned in each Gaussian distribution [24]. The result of GMM is k Gaussian distributions that represent the distribution of grayscale intensity in the histogram, with( − 1) thresholds that separate each of the Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Comparison Of Automatic Marking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the thresholding method greatly influences the final determination of the initial point. In this study we compare the method we propose with 2 comparative thresholding methods, namely the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) [21] and Modified Otsu's thresholding [6]. GMM method was chosen as a comparison because of its ability to do multi-thresholding the same as the HCA method.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Automatic Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%