2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.041
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic segmentation of odor maps in the mouse olfactory bulb using regularized non-negative matrix factorization

Abstract: Segmentation of functional parts in image series of functional activity is a common problem in neuroscience. Here we apply regularized non-negative matrix factorization (rNMF) to extract glomeruli in intrinsic optical signal (IOS) images of the olfactory bulb. Regularization allows us to incorporate prior knowledge about the spatio-temporal characteristics of glomerular signals. We demonstrate how to identify suitable regularization parameters on a surrogate dataset. With appropriate regularization segmentatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some methods rely on priors about morphological properties such as size and shape patterns (Valmianski et al, 2010), and thus are very likely to fail for the astrocyte problem due to the irregular and heterogeneous morphologies of FIUs. The most well-accepted set of sophisticated tools is grounded on matrix decomposition techniques such as independent component analysis (Reidl et al, 2007; Mukamel et al, 2009), sparse dictionary learning (Diego et al, 2013), multilevel sparse matrix factorization (Andilla and Hamprecht, 2013), non-negative matrix factorization (Maruyama et al, 2014; Soelter et al, 2014), and constrained non-negative matrix factorization (Pnevmatikakis et al, 2016). However, just like CellSort, all these neuron-targeted algorithms make either an explicit or implicit assumption that pixels in an FIU are synchronized under the given imaging resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some methods rely on priors about morphological properties such as size and shape patterns (Valmianski et al, 2010), and thus are very likely to fail for the astrocyte problem due to the irregular and heterogeneous morphologies of FIUs. The most well-accepted set of sophisticated tools is grounded on matrix decomposition techniques such as independent component analysis (Reidl et al, 2007; Mukamel et al, 2009), sparse dictionary learning (Diego et al, 2013), multilevel sparse matrix factorization (Andilla and Hamprecht, 2013), non-negative matrix factorization (Maruyama et al, 2014; Soelter et al, 2014), and constrained non-negative matrix factorization (Pnevmatikakis et al, 2016). However, just like CellSort, all these neuron-targeted algorithms make either an explicit or implicit assumption that pixels in an FIU are synchronized under the given imaging resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a handful of algorithms have been developed for analyzing neuronal Ca 2+ imaging data (Reidl et al, 2007; Mukamel et al, 2009; Smith and Häusser, 2010; Valmianski et al, 2010; Andilla and Hamprecht, 2013; Diego et al, 2013; Pachitariu et al, 2013; Kaifosh et al, 2014; Maruyama et al, 2014; Soelter et al, 2014; Pnevmatikakis et al, 2016). However, none of them can be applied to astrocytic Ca 2+ data due to the specific challenges mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We segmented the functional image series into individual glomeruli and their activation course by means of regularized non-negative matrix factorization (rNMF) 36 . Such a factorization disaggregates the measurement matrix into components with a spatial signal distribution D and a common activation course D of the participating pixel.…”
Section: Glomerular Response Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We decomposed IOS image series into 150 components with fixed smoothness regularization parameter GH = 2. The sparseness regularization parameter G; was adjusted such that spatial component correlation was just below 0.5 (see Soelter et al, 2014, for a justification of this value). In image analysis performed to extract MOR18-2 responses, we dismissed the usual non-negativity constraint on the components' activation courses to capture possible odour induced inhibitions.…”
Section: Glomerular Response Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation