2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bibm.2018.8621136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Severity Classification of Coronary Artery Disease via Recurrent Capsule Network

Abstract: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular disease deaths. CAD condition progresses rapidly, if not diagnosed and treated at an early stage may eventually lead to an irreversible state of the heart muscle death. Invasive coronary arteriography is the gold standard technique for CAD diagnosis. Coronary arteriography texts describe which part has stenosis and how much stenosis is in details. It is crucial to conduct the severity classification of CAD. In this paper, we employ a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated in Table II, the proposed model achieves the best performance, and its precision, recall and F 1 -score reach 96.69%, 97.09% and 96.89%, which outperforms the second method by 0.2%, 0.40% and 1.20%, respectively. To further investigate the effectiveness of the proposed model on RC, we use two RC models in medical domain (i.e., RCN [13] and CNN [22]) and one joint model in generic domain (i.e., Joint-Bi-LSTM [4]) as baseline methods. Since RCN and CNN methods are only applied to RC tasks and cannot extract entities from the text, so we directly use the correct entities in the text to evaluate the RC models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As demonstrated in Table II, the proposed model achieves the best performance, and its precision, recall and F 1 -score reach 96.69%, 97.09% and 96.89%, which outperforms the second method by 0.2%, 0.40% and 1.20%, respectively. To further investigate the effectiveness of the proposed model on RC, we use two RC models in medical domain (i.e., RCN [13] and CNN [22]) and one joint model in generic domain (i.e., Joint-Bi-LSTM [4]) as baseline methods. Since RCN and CNN methods are only applied to RC tasks and cannot extract entities from the text, so we directly use the correct entities in the text to evaluate the RC models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural network methods can extract the relation features without complicated feature engineering. e.g., recurrent capsule network [13] and domain invariant convolutional neural network [14]. However, These methods cannot utilize joint features between entity and relation, resulting in lower generalization performance when compared with joint learning methods.…”
Section: B Relation Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have complex computation in data processing. On the other hand, the neural network methods, such as the recurrent capsule network [33] and domain invariant convolution neural network [38], took less computation in extracting features than the conventional methods.Furthermore, in recent years, Deep learning becomes a mainstream method in relation to extraction. In 2014, Zeng et al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronary angiography is the gold standard for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), so it is essential to describe in detail the position and the degree of stenosistext through coronary angiography for classifing the severity of CAD. Wang et al [17] used recursive capsule network (RCN) to extract the semantic relationship between clinically named entities in the coronary angiography text, so as to automatically find out the maximum stenosis degree of each lumen, and finally inferred the coronary artery severity according to the improved Gensini method. e MURA dataset is the largest public musculoskeletal image dataset available currently.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%