2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic sleep staging with a single-channel EEG based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many ML and DL-based models proposed in the literature achieved better accuracy and kappa (κ) values. Although ASSC systems produce better results, a set of specific challenges exist, such as database variability, channel mismatch, class imbalance, inter-class distinction, computational complexity, and scoring issues ( 63 , 65 ). Most of the ML and DL-based models proposed in the literature used distinct datasets; these data had been collected from different individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many ML and DL-based models proposed in the literature achieved better accuracy and kappa (κ) values. Although ASSC systems produce better results, a set of specific challenges exist, such as database variability, channel mismatch, class imbalance, inter-class distinction, computational complexity, and scoring issues ( 63 , 65 ). Most of the ML and DL-based models proposed in the literature used distinct datasets; these data had been collected from different individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An in-home ASSC system based on single-channel EEG is required to alleviate the problems in manual scoring and enable the development of a convenient, comfortable, and less expensive in-home sleep monitoring system ( 63 ). Single-channel systems have excellent scope in terms of convenience and cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy, F1-score, and kappa coefficient are 86.4%, 0.8, and 0.81, respectively. In [ 49 ], Cong et al proposed a classification model with the XGBoost algorithm and tested it using fivefold cross-validation on three different databases. In the tasks of 4-class and 5-class sleep staging, the proposed method achieved an accuracy of 87.5% and 85.8% in the SHHS database, respectively, and the kappa coefficient is 0.79 and 0.81, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, Hassan et al used the wavelet transform to decompose the EEG into multiple sub-bands [12], extracted four statistical features of the sub-bands, and used a bootstrap aggregation model (bagging) to classify the EEG in the Sleep-EDF database and the Dreams Subjects database for Class 4 and Class 5 sleep staging, with accuracies of 94.36% and 93.69% and 83.78% and 78.95%, respectively. In 2020, Liu et al used the ensemble empirical model algorithm (EEMD) to decompose the EEG and extract features of the time domain, statistics, and nonlinear dynamics [13] and used the gradient boosting algorithm to classify the Sleep-EDF database, DREAMS Subjects database, and Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) database for 4 and 5 categories of sleep staging of the EEG with accuracies of 93.1% and 91.9%, 86.4% and 83.4%, and 87.5% and 85.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%