2021 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/spin52536.2021.9566150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Speaker Verification using Gammatone Frequency Cepstral Coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, the temporal profiles of specific cepstral coefficient sets consistently demonstrate analogous behaviors in both training and testing, despite variations in coefficient amplitudes across these stages. This underscores the constancy in the temporal forms of selected cepstral coefficients from training to testing [ 29 ].…”
Section: Feature Extraction Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remarkably, the temporal profiles of specific cepstral coefficient sets consistently demonstrate analogous behaviors in both training and testing, despite variations in coefficient amplitudes across these stages. This underscores the constancy in the temporal forms of selected cepstral coefficients from training to testing [ 29 ].…”
Section: Feature Extraction Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs serve as simulation models for the human brain functions, emulating the brain capacity to perform complex tasks by processing data in a manner akin to human cognition [ 29 , 30 ]. Structured with an assembly of numerous simple processing units known as neurons, ANNs are interlinked through connections denoted as weights.…”
Section: Classification Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the issue of noise remains open with MFCC and CQCC features. In [31], authors used GTCC feature and pitch at front-end for feature extraction, and passed these features to GMM and KNN to improve the performance of ASV system. Kaun et al [10] applied auditory based BFCC features with AURORA 2 dataset, and compared these features' performance with MFCC using HMM model.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study in [25], proposed a speaker identification system for forensic applications using the GMM with universal background model (GMM-UBM) and GFCC features in noisy environments. In the reference [26] a GMM method and GFCC feature were employed for speaker verification using datasets with real-world noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%