Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1991996.1992047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic tagging and geotagging in video collections and communities

Abstract: Automatically generated tags and geotags hold great promise to improve access to video collections and online communities. We overview three tasks offered in the MediaEval 2010 benchmarking initiative, for each, describing its use scenario, definition and the data set released. For each task, a reference algorithm is presented that was used within MediaEval 2010 and comments are included on lessons learned. The Tagging Task, Professional involves automatically matching episodes in a collection of Dutch televis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this challenge in related domains, automatic tagging mechanisms have been proposed that extract keywords from textual meta data and content. In the case of shared multimedia content, however, this is often not feasible with satisfying precision, as meta data can be sparse or ambiguous and concept detection from audio-visual signals is still considered more difficult than text-based alternatives [14]. For example, many videos on YouTube feature only a title and a brief textual description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this challenge in related domains, automatic tagging mechanisms have been proposed that extract keywords from textual meta data and content. In the case of shared multimedia content, however, this is often not feasible with satisfying precision, as meta data can be sparse or ambiguous and concept detection from audio-visual signals is still considered more difficult than text-based alternatives [14]. For example, many videos on YouTube feature only a title and a brief textual description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of metadata that can be used to index the content to facilitate its finding and re-finding. Tags can come in different forms including semantic tags, affective tags and geotags [2]. In contrast to classic tagging schemes where users direct input is mandatory, human-centered implicit tagging was proposed [3] to gather tags and annotations without any effort from users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments are performed on two datasets, that are reissues of the TRECVID 2007, 2008 and 2009 data made for the purposes of the "Tagging Task: Professional Version" offered for the MediaEval 2010 3 benchmark [13]. This benchmark also provided ground truth in the form of semantic theme labels assigned by professional archivists.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%