“…Thus, as shown in [6], the large number of grid points near the wall for a high resolution of the boundary layers, the adaptation of the NavierStokes grid in the laminar, turbulent, and transitional boundary-layer regions and the generation of new adapted grids for the RANS solver after every step of the transition location iteration are avoided, and the computational time can be massively reduced. In addition, the number of RANS iteration cycles between two steps of the transition location iteration can be highly reduced compared to an approach where the boundary-layer parameters are computed directly from the RANS grid [23,24], because the surface pressure converges significantly faster in the RANS computation than the boundarylayer velocity profiles [25], which are the basis for the computation of the boundary-layer parameters.…”