2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic tree species recognition with quantitative structure models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of any TreeQSM output is a reflection of the quality of the point cloud on which it was based and the accuracy assessed for reconstruction. Several studies proved that TreeQSM was able to reconstruct smaller branches with high accuracy when these branches had sufficient point density for an proper reconstruction Calders et al 2015;Åkerblom et al 2017). In our study, we scanned the trees in dense tropical environments, which made it difficult to scan properly the smaller branches inside the crown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The quality of any TreeQSM output is a reflection of the quality of the point cloud on which it was based and the accuracy assessed for reconstruction. Several studies proved that TreeQSM was able to reconstruct smaller branches with high accuracy when these branches had sufficient point density for an proper reconstruction Calders et al 2015;Åkerblom et al 2017). In our study, we scanned the trees in dense tropical environments, which made it difficult to scan properly the smaller branches inside the crown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When combining multispectral images with LiDAR data, it is possible to achieve high accuracies (above 90%) in vegetation mapping [22]. In addition, terrestrial laser scanning is used for tree species classification and provides very detailed information about forest structure [23]. Although LiDAR and hyperspectral data possess high potential for species classification, their operational use is restricted owing to limited availability and high acquisition costs [3,24], and the applicability of these data in a regional or global scale is still limited [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dense forest stands, the occlusion may limit the number of observations that are received from stems and crowns which decreases the forest characterization capacity [4,60]. In general, the number of scans that are required for automatic detection of each tree [23,49], tree species recognition [61], and systematic underestimation of tree height [21] are the major bottle-necks when mere TLS is used for forest characterization. Use of UAVs have mainly the same limitations as airborne remote sensing technologies, such as the lack of direct observation methods for single tree attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%