2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13881-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Word Sense Disambiguation Using Cooccurrence and Hierarchical Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-occurrence information between words is also used in some WSD work [13,17,7,24,10,27]. Among them, Guthrie [13], Fernandez-Amoros [10] and Véronis [27] introduced unsupervised methods. Guthrie [13] proposed a two-level WSD on subject (domain) level and sense level (within a subject).…”
Section: Traditional Wsdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Co-occurrence information between words is also used in some WSD work [13,17,7,24,10,27]. Among them, Guthrie [13], Fernandez-Amoros [10] and Véronis [27] introduced unsupervised methods. Guthrie [13] proposed a two-level WSD on subject (domain) level and sense level (within a subject).…”
Section: Traditional Wsdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each disambiguation level, they chose the subject/sense with the highest similarity between the context and the description of the subject/sense in a dictionary. Fernandez-Amoros [10] used cooccurrence to compute a relative matrix using mutual information (MI) measure. They used the MI between the target word and words of its context as the weight of each context words, and select the sense whose WordNet definition is most similar to the context by the bag-of-words model.…”
Section: Traditional Wsdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this was that unrelated words rarely appear in both context and sense definition. A solution for this that involved extracting preference and layer information from the corpus to extend the sense annotation was proposed sometime later by Fernandez-Amoros et al [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%