2018
DOI: 10.3390/info9060138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatically Specifying a Parallel Composition of Matchers in Ontology Matching Process by Using Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: Today, there is a rapid increase of the available data because of advances in information and communications technology. Therefore, many mutually heterogeneous data sources that describe the same domain of interest exist. To facilitate the integration of these heterogeneous data sources, an ontology can be used as it enriches the knowledge of a data source by giving a detailed description of entities and their mutual relations within the domain of interest. Ontology matching is a key issue in integrating heter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural networks are used to assist the process to determine the correspondences [69] while clustering techniques are applied to reduce and limit the correspondences search space [33,70]. Genetic algorithms are used to determine some parameters like thresholds or weights used in some approaches [71,72] and to measure linguistic similarity natural language processing (NLP) are applied to labels of elements of schemas [11,73] represented by characters [74,75] or by vectors (obtained after transforming words using word embedding) [76][77][78][79]. Other techniques are employed for the data to improve the precision of the similarity computation and thus the selection of correspondences like analysis [39,80,81], statistics [82][83][84] or probabilities [85][86][87][88] that is used to make the process of matching independent as possible from parameters and human interventions.…”
Section: Overview Of Schema Matching Principles and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural networks are used to assist the process to determine the correspondences [69] while clustering techniques are applied to reduce and limit the correspondences search space [33,70]. Genetic algorithms are used to determine some parameters like thresholds or weights used in some approaches [71,72] and to measure linguistic similarity natural language processing (NLP) are applied to labels of elements of schemas [11,73] represented by characters [74,75] or by vectors (obtained after transforming words using word embedding) [76][77][78][79]. Other techniques are employed for the data to improve the precision of the similarity computation and thus the selection of correspondences like analysis [39,80,81], statistics [82][83][84] or probabilities [85][86][87][88] that is used to make the process of matching independent as possible from parameters and human interventions.…”
Section: Overview Of Schema Matching Principles and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic algorithm based ontology alignment (GOAL) [22] is the first matching system that utilises EA to determine the optimal weight configuration for a weighted average aggregation of several similarity measures by considering a reference alignment. A similar idea of combining multiple similarity measures is also developed by Naya et al [23], Alexandru Lucian and Iftene [24] and Gulić et al [11]. To improve efficiency, a hybrid EA is presented to tune the parameters for aggregating various similarity measures [12, 25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since none of the similarity measures can distinguish the same biomedical concepts in any contexts independently, the ontology matching systems actually apply several similarity measures to determine the correspondences between particular biomedical concepts. The most common composition of multiple similarity measures is the parallel composition, where the similarity measures are executed independently from each other and the aggregated correspondence is computed afterwards [11]. Currently, researchers mainly focus on how to tune the aggregating weights for various similarity measures to improve the quality of the ontology alignments [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OMM process usually uses (1) multiple similarity measures, (2) a method of combining similarity measures, and (3) a method of selecting candidate matches, where evolutionary algorithms are commonly employed in at least one of these last two steps. Several evolutionary algorithms have been applied, and the most common are the Genetic Algorithm (GA) [8], the Memetic Algorithm [9], and the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%