11th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/spline.2007.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automating Mappings between Use Case Diagrams and Feature Models for Software Product Lines

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerable research has already been devoted to documenting variability in use cases. Many approaches propose using variability models, e.g., feature models, that are traced to use case specifications and diagrams ( Alferez et al, 2008;Eriksson et al, 20 05, 20 09;Buhne et al, 20 06;Braganca and Machado, 2007;Griss et al, 1998 ). With the PL extensions, our method enables analysts to document variability directly in use case diagrams and specifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable research has already been devoted to documenting variability in use cases. Many approaches propose using variability models, e.g., feature models, that are traced to use case specifications and diagrams ( Alferez et al, 2008;Eriksson et al, 20 05, 20 09;Buhne et al, 20 06;Braganca and Machado, 2007;Griss et al, 1998 ). With the PL extensions, our method enables analysts to document variability directly in use case diagrams and specifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Braganca and Machado [15] describe an approach for automating the transformation of UML use cases into FMs. In their work, each use case is mapped to a feature.…”
Section: Documentation Of Mined Features In Splmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work addresses the problem of documenting features mined from several variants of a software system. Our mined feature implementations are sets of source code elements that are more formal artifacts than the product descriptions used in [21] and give complementary information as compared to use-case diagrams [15]. Our approach relies on commonality and variability across the variants to apply information retrieval methods more e±ciently than in a single software system.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No método PLUSS (Eriksson et al 2005), cada feature pode estar associada a um caso de uso, um cenário alternativo ou um passo específico. Bragança et al (2007) apresentaram um método para automatizar a transformação de casos de uso da UML em modelo de features.…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified