2020
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automating the interpretation of PM 2.5 time‐resolved measurements using a data‐driven approach

Abstract: The rapid development of automated measurement equipment enables researchers to collect greater quantities of time-resolved data from indoor and outdoor environments. While significant, the interpretation of the resulting data can be a timeconsuming effort. This paper introduces an automated process of interpreting PM 2.5 time-resolved data and differentiating PM 2.5 emissions resulting from indoor and outdoor sources. We use Random Forest (RF), a machine learning approach, to study a dataset of 836 indoor emi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.2.3.3 PM 2.5 Emissions from Occupants' Daily Activities Continuous PM 2.5 emissions from human daily activity were calculated using a data set consisting of measurements from 70 single-family houses and 23 low-income apartments built from 2011 to 2017 in California. In this dataset, the indoor PM emission events were first identified by applying a machine learning approach to the time-resolved PM concentrations measured in each home (Tang et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2020). That resulted in 5114 mg total PM mass emitted from 53 measured single family houses and 2825 mg total PM mass emitted from 20 low-income apartments.…”
Section: Building Acrolein Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2.3.3 PM 2.5 Emissions from Occupants' Daily Activities Continuous PM 2.5 emissions from human daily activity were calculated using a data set consisting of measurements from 70 single-family houses and 23 low-income apartments built from 2011 to 2017 in California. In this dataset, the indoor PM emission events were first identified by applying a machine learning approach to the time-resolved PM concentrations measured in each home (Tang et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2020). That resulted in 5114 mg total PM mass emitted from 53 measured single family houses and 2825 mg total PM mass emitted from 20 low-income apartments.…”
Section: Building Acrolein Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM2.5 emissions were identified by applying a machine learning approach called Random Forest (RF) to the time-resolved PM2.5 concentration measured in the living room of each home, as described in detail elsewhere (Tang, Chan, and Sohn 2020). Briefly, the RF model was originally developed using a training dataset where the indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations were collected from 18 California low-income apartments (W. R. Chan et al 2018).…”
Section: Fine Particulate Matter Event Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM 2.5 emissions were identified by applying a machine learning approach called Random Forest (RF) to the time-resolved PM 2.5 concentration measured in the living room of each home, as described in detail elsewhere [48]. Briefly, the RF model was originally developed using a training dataset where the indoor and outdoor PM 2.5 concentrations were collected from 18 California low-income apartments [49].…”
Section: Pm 25 Event Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%