Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices &Amp; Services 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2628363.2628391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automating UI tests for mobile applications with formal gesture descriptions

Abstract: Touch-and gesture-based interfaces are common in applications for mobile devices. By evolving into mass market products, smartphones and tablets created an increased need for specialized software engineering methods. To ensure high quality applications, constant and efficient testing is crucial in software development. However, testing mobile applications is still cumbersome, time-consuming and error-prone. One reason is the devices' focus on touch-based interaction -gestures cannot be easily incorporated into… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To describe testing scenarios, ANDROFLEET provides a DSL to developers. Previous research have extended Calabash framework 3 to add some context-based testing [18], [17]. AN-DROFLEET adopts a similar approach by extending Calabash to introduce a WiFi P2P specific vocabulary.…”
Section: A Describing Test Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe testing scenarios, ANDROFLEET provides a DSL to developers. Previous research have extended Calabash framework 3 to add some context-based testing [18], [17]. AN-DROFLEET adopts a similar approach by extending Calabash to introduce a WiFi P2P specific vocabulary.…”
Section: A Describing Test Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that mimicking user behaviour is one of the key factors in generating gesture-based test cases. It helps in executing realistic test scenarios and standard gestures [1], [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed approach in terms of, (1) mimicking the user's behavior; and (2) increasing the code coverage of the software under test (SUT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gesture-based user interfaces have been reported to be more difficult to implement and test than traditional mouse and pointer interfaces [3]. Gesture-based interaction is supported at the source code level (typically, third-generation languages) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%