2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automation and applications of the tolerance limit method in estimating meat withdrawal periods for veterinary drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results allow the possibility of new commercial opportunities since drug residues must be under MRLs established by national and international regulations and the trade agreements increasingly require stricter controls and are essential for international markets. In addition, a food with traces of veterinary drug residues below the maximum allowed limits is considered safe ( Udiani et al., 2018 ), and taking into account that the eating habits of consumers are migrating towards products free of chemical pollutants ( Moreno & Lanusse, 2017 ), people are now looking not only for compliance with the regulatory requirements but also at foods with lower levels of these compounds. Therefore, the levels found below the accepted limits are considered to have a competitive advantage for the country.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results allow the possibility of new commercial opportunities since drug residues must be under MRLs established by national and international regulations and the trade agreements increasingly require stricter controls and are essential for international markets. In addition, a food with traces of veterinary drug residues below the maximum allowed limits is considered safe ( Udiani et al., 2018 ), and taking into account that the eating habits of consumers are migrating towards products free of chemical pollutants ( Moreno & Lanusse, 2017 ), people are now looking not only for compliance with the regulatory requirements but also at foods with lower levels of these compounds. Therefore, the levels found below the accepted limits are considered to have a competitive advantage for the country.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These singularities, related to the different MRLs, procedures for calculating WP, and drug tissue residue data considered, have been demonstrated. When Udiani et al [38] estimated the WP for veterinary drugs, such as sulfamethazine in swine liver [35] and flunixin in calf liver [26], different values were obtained depending on the data and the MRL taken into account. In the same way, tissue residue levels of florfenicol and tylosin in different tissues were considered to determine the WP by the linear regression method with both recommendations (FDA and EU), and different values were obtained [39].…”
Section: Lack Of Global Harmonization: Mrls/tolerances and Withdrawal Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%