2021
DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2021.1891659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automation, automatic capital returns, and the functional income distribution

Abstract: This paper studies the economic implications of automation. We consider that automation is affected by disruptive technologies which entail a structural change consisting in the introduction of a new physical capital input (a combination of artificial intelligence and autonomous robots), additional to "traditional" capital assets and labor. This new "automatic" physical capital is assumed to carry out production activities without the need to be combined with labor. We propose a simple production function and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Working with the novel paradigm of task-based production complements a strand of studies that concentrate on the substitution of labor with capital, expanding on the modeling of Tinbergen's race of skill and technological progress, coined as "the canonical model" by Acemoglu and Autor (2011). In this strand, skill-biased technological progress is conceptualized via a, possibly nested, CES production function on (often skill and unskilled) labor, capital and/or robots; for example, Kotlikoff and Sachs (2012), Berg et al (2018), Lin and Weise (2019), Benzell et al (2019), Prettner and Strulik (2020), Torres and Casas (2022), and Gasteiger and Prettner (2022).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Working with the novel paradigm of task-based production complements a strand of studies that concentrate on the substitution of labor with capital, expanding on the modeling of Tinbergen's race of skill and technological progress, coined as "the canonical model" by Acemoglu and Autor (2011). In this strand, skill-biased technological progress is conceptualized via a, possibly nested, CES production function on (often skill and unskilled) labor, capital and/or robots; for example, Kotlikoff and Sachs (2012), Berg et al (2018), Lin and Weise (2019), Benzell et al (2019), Prettner and Strulik (2020), Torres and Casas (2022), and Gasteiger and Prettner (2022).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018), Lin and Weise (2019), Benzell et al. (2019), Prettner and Strulik (2020), Torres and Casas (2022), and Gasteiger and Prettner (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For additional information about the characteristics of the production function, seeCasas and Torres (2021) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section presents the model specifying two separated technological frameworks, the households' maximization problem and the government's budget. As technological frameworks, we consider the most widely extended approach in the literature arguing that new autonomous capital exclusively replaces human labor and the approach exposed in Casas and Torres (2023) arguing that new autonomous capital replaces both human labor and traditional capital.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we examine how total tax revenues, including social security contributions, evolve with automation in the long run. In order to carry out this analysis, we use the automation model by Casas and Torres (2023), extended with taxes. Using the steady-state solution of the calibrated model, we carry out three experiments to explore how tax revenues evolve as the new autonomous technology spread through the economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%