2019
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1630825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automobile injury trends in the contemporary fleet: Belted occupants in frontal collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of aviation-related fatalities in 1980 and 1990 demonstrated that 42% of fatalities had multiple injuries, 12% had internal injuries, and 22% had head injuries, but the study did not provide further details on types of internal injuries (Li and Baker, 1997). Upper and lower extremities were the most commonly injured body regions among MVC victims with at least one AIS 2+ injury (Forman et al, 2019;Ye et al, 2015;Poplin et al, 2015). However, Mallory et al (2017) demonstrated injury distributions similar to our analysis, with higher injury rates in the thorax than other AIS body regions for most types of MVC impacts (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study of aviation-related fatalities in 1980 and 1990 demonstrated that 42% of fatalities had multiple injuries, 12% had internal injuries, and 22% had head injuries, but the study did not provide further details on types of internal injuries (Li and Baker, 1997). Upper and lower extremities were the most commonly injured body regions among MVC victims with at least one AIS 2+ injury (Forman et al, 2019;Ye et al, 2015;Poplin et al, 2015). However, Mallory et al (2017) demonstrated injury distributions similar to our analysis, with higher injury rates in the thorax than other AIS body regions for most types of MVC impacts (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The thorax and lower extremity body regions had the highest frequency of injuries of at least moderate severity. First described by Forman et al (2019), our analysis also provided a more detailed injury classi cation of moderate or worse (AIS 2+) injuries in order to help characterize crash biomechanics and identify potential areas of enhanced safety design. For example, as opposed to the AIS body region category "lower extremity", by distinguishing between leg and pelvic injury severities, one may begin to narrow the impact points and pathways of force distribution, which in theory should help identify the likely biomechanics of injury and target more focused intervention strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another modern car safety system aiming at avoiding or mitigating crashes is Autonomous Emergency Braking, which has been shown to dramatically reduce road traffic casualties 63,64 . Furthermore, older car occupants involved in a crash have been found to have a higher risk of injury compared to younger 65,66 , and women have been found to have a higher injury risk compared to men 67,68 .…”
Section: Factors Influencing Injury Risk and Its Long-term Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an ageing population, these injuries will be increasingly common in future years if no intervention is implemented, which addresses them. Furthermore, these injuries have not decreased over the recent decades, but rather remained on a similar frequency 67 or even increased 133 . This warrants further studies on consequences of spinal injuries in this age group, and how to effectively prevent them.…”
Section: Sociodemographic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a direct listing of speci c AIS codes would be overly detailed. Similar to a recent investigation of injury trends in belted MVC occupants, injuries of moderate or worse severity (AIS 2+) were classi ed into one detailed body region category based on research from anatomy, injury biomechanics, and injury epidemiology in order to help identify focused areas of prevention and control (Forman et al, 2019). Moderate or worse (AIS 2+) injuries were chosen for this classi cation system because critical injuries that cause morbidity and mortality and are preventable through engineering designs are included in these severity categories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%