2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2009.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomic aspect of emotional response in depressed patients: Relationships with personality

Abstract: SummaryStudy aim. -Affective symptoms are major descriptors of depression; therefore, a lot of studies investigated emotional-responsiveness modulation in depression, and reported either a potentiation of negative affects, a reduction of positive affects, or a reduction of both positive and negative affects. On the other hand, personality was classically found to be modulated in depression, with behavioral inhibition system (BIS)-related dimensions (namely harm avoidance (HA), neuroticism) showing higher score… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that mean LPP amplitude and skin conductance magnitude were negatively associated with subclinical depressive symptomatology, mirroring previous findings with P3 (Bruder et al, 1995; Diner et al, 1985; Pfefferbaum et al, 1984) and skin conductance (Iacono et al, 1983; Ward et al, 1983) in depressed participants. Furthermore, consistent with our findings for subclinical depression, depressed patients have specific skin conductance deficits to pleasant pictures (Margada & Hansenne, 2009). However, our results contrast against previous P3 work in subclinical depression (Cavanaugh & Geisler, 2006), which indicated that P3 was a better marker of low positive emotion than underarousal in subclinical depression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We found that mean LPP amplitude and skin conductance magnitude were negatively associated with subclinical depressive symptomatology, mirroring previous findings with P3 (Bruder et al, 1995; Diner et al, 1985; Pfefferbaum et al, 1984) and skin conductance (Iacono et al, 1983; Ward et al, 1983) in depressed participants. Furthermore, consistent with our findings for subclinical depression, depressed patients have specific skin conductance deficits to pleasant pictures (Margada & Hansenne, 2009). However, our results contrast against previous P3 work in subclinical depression (Cavanaugh & Geisler, 2006), which indicated that P3 was a better marker of low positive emotion than underarousal in subclinical depression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, compared to the other genotypes, the A allele homozygotes appraised the pleasant and unpleasant but not the neutral pictures, as less arousing and this specificity to the affective pictures argues against a general peculiarity in the way these subjects appraise along the arousal dimension. This pattern is consistent with low emotional arousal in depression [35], fits exactly with IAPS rating data from depressed patients [47] and was mediated by their depression-equivalent mood state post-testing (i.e. high discontentment-low alertness).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Consistently, state anxiety was associated with a general enhancement of the LPP for negative (fear and sadness) and neutral, but not happy expressions. Our results are consistent with previous observation (i.e., skin-conductance) that HA is not involved in the decreased emotional response to pleasant pictures in depressed patients [35] and suggest that negative affectivity has an independent influence on the increased attention towards negative emotions. Our results also suggest that although depressive symptoms appear to be associated with reduced processing of positive emotions, negative affectivity (high HA and high trait/state anxiety) appear to enhance the processing of negative emotions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%