2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl078013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Biogeochemical Floats Detect Significant Carbon Dioxide Outgassing in the High‐Latitude Southern Ocean

Abstract: Although the Southern Ocean is thought to account for a significant portion of the contemporary oceanic uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2), flux estimates in this region are based on sparse observations that are strongly biased toward summer. Here we present new estimates of Southern Ocean air‐sea CO2 fluxes calculated with measurements from biogeochemical profiling floats deployed by the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling project during 2014–2017. Compared to ship‐based CO2 flux estimates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
264
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
19
264
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the implications for this discrepancy are potentially immense. An initial analysis of 35 floats over 3 years in the Southern Ocean found an annual uptake of only 0.08 ± 0.55 Pg C year −1 , instead of the~1 Pg C year −1 uptake calculated from ship-based estimates, due primarily to increased wintertime outgassing around the Polar Front [100]. This discrepancy represents approximately 50% of the annual contemporary global oceanic CO 2 uptake [1], and would pose a major challenge to our understanding of the global carbon budget by effectively eliminating the role of the Southern Ocean as a carbon sink.…”
Section: Global Ocean Observations From Profiling Floatsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the implications for this discrepancy are potentially immense. An initial analysis of 35 floats over 3 years in the Southern Ocean found an annual uptake of only 0.08 ± 0.55 Pg C year −1 , instead of the~1 Pg C year −1 uptake calculated from ship-based estimates, due primarily to increased wintertime outgassing around the Polar Front [100]. This discrepancy represents approximately 50% of the annual contemporary global oceanic CO 2 uptake [1], and would pose a major challenge to our understanding of the global carbon budget by effectively eliminating the role of the Southern Ocean as a carbon sink.…”
Section: Global Ocean Observations From Profiling Floatsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The array of biogeochemical floats in the Southern Ocean is providing novel insights into air-sea CO 2 fluxes and biogeochemical processes. For example, large discrepancies in winter surface pCO 2 between float observations and climatologies based on shipboard observations [25] are consistently observed [98][99][100][101]. This is not particularly surprising because wintertime shipboard data are sparse.…”
Section: Global Ocean Observations From Profiling Floatsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each color represents sampling areas and abbreviations. * indicates data acquired in four regions below 30°S, which have been delineated by using temperature profiles (Gray et al, ): Sub‐Tropical Zone (STZ) with a temperature at 100 m above 11 °C; the Sub‐Antarctic Zone (SAZ) with a temperature at 400 m below 5 °C; the Polar Frontal Zone (PFZ) with the minimum temperature between 0 and 200 m above 2 °C; and the Antarctic Southern Zone and Seasonal Ice Zone (ASZ_SIZ) minimum temperature between 0 and 200 m below 2 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the SO Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling project deployed floats with the ability to estimate the carbon concentration at the surface and CO 2 exchange between the atmosphere and the ocean. The new observations revealed the wintertime CO 2 outgassing near the ACC (Gray et al, ), which had been underestimated by most numerical models. Hence it is important to evaluate whether NIWs are properly included in those numerical simulations in diagnosing the models' performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%