2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-017-0049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous calibration of single spin qubit operations

Abstract: Fully autonomous precise control of qubits is crucial for quantum information processing, quantum communication, and quantum sensing applications. It requires minimal human intervention on the ability to model, to predict, and to anticipate the quantum dynamics, as well as to precisely control and calibrate single qubit operations. Here, we demonstrate single qubit autonomous calibrations via closed-loop optimisations of electron spin quantum operations in diamond. The operations are examined by quantum state … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, if closed loop optimal control is employed, the optimization incorporates unknown and unpredictable drifts into the pulse design as well as makes the pulses robust against statistical disturbances (noise on the pulses and the figure of merit) [33,41,43]. Indeed, we could confirm the robustness of the optimal strategies by numerical simulations of the system evolution steered by the optimized dCRAB pulse (from Fig.…”
Section: B Optimized Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, if closed loop optimal control is employed, the optimization incorporates unknown and unpredictable drifts into the pulse design as well as makes the pulses robust against statistical disturbances (noise on the pulses and the figure of merit) [33,41,43]. Indeed, we could confirm the robustness of the optimal strategies by numerical simulations of the system evolution steered by the optimized dCRAB pulse (from Fig.…”
Section: B Optimized Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Finally, we point out that the optimal pulses identified here are expected to work equally well in a (reasonable) noisy environment, due to their intrinsic robustness against small variations, as it has been already theoretically and experimentally showed in many different scenarios [28,[40][41][42][43][44]. Moreover, if closed loop optimal control is employed, the optimization incorporates unknown and unpredictable drifts into the pulse design as well as makes the pulses robust against statistical disturbances (noise on the pulses and the figure of merit) [33,41,43].…”
Section: B Optimized Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Once gate errors have been characterized, they can be corrected by manual or automatic tuning of the available parameters. Automatic tuning is indispensable for scaling up to many qubits and to systematically deal with non-orthogonal gate parameters and cross-talk [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . The moderate resource requirements of GSC are especially advantageous for automated calibration, which feeds the extracted gate errors into an iterative optimization algorithm (from now on referred to as solver).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To counteract variations in the NV spin transitions frequency and its driving strength, one can utilize optimal control theory, which has been used for NV spin control in a variety of applications [18][19][20][21][22]. In general, the strategy is to numerically optimize a pulse to achieve a desired quantum state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%