[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software &Amp; Applications Conference
DOI: 10.1109/cmpsac.1989.65053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous decentralized system test technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field testing was first considered an opportunity to deal with failures that were hard or too costly to reproduce in the laboratory, with a few studies in the nineties addressing autonomic systems [51,100], and real-time issues [98]. It attracted then steady interest in the early years of the first decade of this century, with a sudden burst of results from 2007 on, mostly pushed by the advent of service-oriented architectures, which lacked centralized control for testing purposes.…”
Section: Production Environment Production Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field testing was first considered an opportunity to deal with failures that were hard or too costly to reproduce in the laboratory, with a few studies in the nineties addressing autonomic systems [51,100], and real-time issues [98]. It attracted then steady interest in the early years of the first decade of this century, with a sudden burst of results from 2007 on, mostly pushed by the advent of service-oriented architectures, which lacked centralized control for testing purposes.…”
Section: Production Environment Production Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplication (also called Cloning) [6], [8], [17] consists of cloning the execution state (e.g., by forking a parallel process [17]) and executing in-vivo tests on the cloned execution state, hence ensuring that there is no interference with the end user execution of the application (in-memory side effects are prevented, but of course other side effects on persistent storage are not dealt with). Another proposed isolation mechanism is Test mode execution [3], [10], [12], [14], [21]. It requires a way to differentiate between the execution of a component in normal operation mode vs. the testing mode.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires a way to differentiate between the execution of a component in normal operation mode vs. the testing mode. In the latter case, counter measures are taken to ensure that test mode execution does not affect the normal execution state (e.g., by tagging invocations and data with a test tag [12], [13]). Another clean and elegant solution consists of using a transactional memory [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The on-line test must not disturb the operating system. The ADS ensures the on-line test satisfies the above requirement [5] [6].…”
Section: On-line Test Technique Based On Adsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on this ADS, an on-line test technique was proposed [5] [6]. The technique verifies that newly added application software produces correct output by receiving the real data in the real environment without disrupting the operating systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%