2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cdc45484.2021.9683560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Error and Constructive Observer Design for Group Affine Systems

Abstract: Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) are algorithms that fuse inertial measurements of angular velocity and specific acceleration with supplementary sensors including GNSS and magnetometers to estimate the position, velocity and attitude, or extended pose, of a vehicle. The industry-standard extended Kalman filter (EKF) does not come with strong stability or robustness guarantees and can be subject to catastrophic failure. This paper exploits a Lie group symmetry of the INS dynamics to propose the first nonlinear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We emphasize again that the closed loop under our proposed certified control law µ operates reliably in the sense that it exponentially converges to the origin. On the contrary, the established approach of designing an LQR controller µ LQR based on the linear lifted system (19) learned via linear EDMD (20) leads to an unstable and, hence, unsafe behavior of the nonlinear system.…”
Section: Nonlinear System With Koopman Invariant Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We emphasize again that the closed loop under our proposed certified control law µ operates reliably in the sense that it exponentially converges to the origin. On the contrary, the established approach of designing an LQR controller µ LQR based on the linear lifted system (19) learned via linear EDMD (20) leads to an unstable and, hence, unsafe behavior of the nonlinear system.…”
Section: Nonlinear System With Koopman Invariant Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use [a : b] := Z ∩ [a, b] and [b] := [1 : b].2 Here, we tacitly assumed invariance of X under the flow such that the observable functions are defined on x(t; x, u) for all x ∈ X. This assumption can be relaxed by considering initial values contained in a tightened version of X, see, e.g.,[20] for details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%