2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2012.6385670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous failure detection and multimodal sensor fusion in a modular arm model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Gl 2 's receptive field (Equation 29) is narrower than all other receptive fields, its dispersion is lower, and m GL 2 mainly detects the different dispersions, while it might be more interesting to instead detect systematic errors of the mean. Thus, for this application, a dispersion-independent measure (Ehrenfeld and Butz, 2012, 2013) might be more appropriate. This would yield much higher measures m GL 2 than shown in Figure 7, top-right.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As Gl 2 's receptive field (Equation 29) is narrower than all other receptive fields, its dispersion is lower, and m GL 2 mainly detects the different dispersions, while it might be more interesting to instead detect systematic errors of the mean. Thus, for this application, a dispersion-independent measure (Ehrenfeld and Butz, 2012, 2013) might be more appropriate. This would yield much higher measures m GL 2 than shown in Figure 7, top-right.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improvement is even visible under strong noise (red vs. yellow in Figure 8). Again, a dispersion-independent measure (Ehrenfeld and Butz, 2012, 2013) could improve the performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations