Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Designing/Selecting the proper sand control mechanism for horizontal wells in unconsolidated heavy-oil reservoirs tend to be under-looked in some cases. Stand-alone completions pose some sand control challenges, which could jeopardize the oil production or even lead to critical problems. Massive sand production, screen/formation plugging, formation of velocity hot-spots and mechanical integrity failures are some of the well-known issues. This study attempts to optimize the sand control design for horizontal wells in a heavy-oil field in Colombia. A careful selection of representative core data was made to study the variation of sand Particle Size Distribution (PSD) within the development area. Reservoir fluid properties were analyzed. Based on PSD variation and current design criteria in the industry, several seamed slotted-liner configurations were proposed as an alternative completion for testing. Later, a series of large-scale Sand Retention Tests (SRTs) were performed to assess the selected alternatives under typical field production conditions. Effects of aperture size and open to flow area (OFA) were investigated to evaluate flow and sand control performance. This investigation started by a detailed study of the PSD, particle shape variation and composition of fines in the development area. The PSDs were then classified into four distinct minor and major sand facies, ranging from medium to very coarse sand with different fines content. Further investigations have shown that current design is only suitable for a limited number of PSDs, while the overall PSD classes indicate requirement of wider slot aperture sizes. The results of the SRTs indicated that the flow performance of the screen is mainly controlled by the slot aperture. Choosing the optimized aperture size avoids unacceptable sanding even for the multiphase flow scenarios with gas. Results also indicated that by increasing the aperture size and application of the seamed slots for the studied formation, plugging could be mitigated. Finally, a detailed Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was conducted to compare the mechanical integrity of the current slotted liner design and the optimized design obtained from the experimental testing. A comprehensive sand control design workflow for cold primary heavy oil production in horizontal wells is presented in this work. The current study is one of the first that investigates and compares conventional straight slotted liners with seamed slotted liners at larger scale for a field. Moreover, this study helps to better understand the effect of design parameters of seamed slotted liners on sand control, flow performance and mechanical strength.
Designing/Selecting the proper sand control mechanism for horizontal wells in unconsolidated heavy-oil reservoirs tend to be under-looked in some cases. Stand-alone completions pose some sand control challenges, which could jeopardize the oil production or even lead to critical problems. Massive sand production, screen/formation plugging, formation of velocity hot-spots and mechanical integrity failures are some of the well-known issues. This study attempts to optimize the sand control design for horizontal wells in a heavy-oil field in Colombia. A careful selection of representative core data was made to study the variation of sand Particle Size Distribution (PSD) within the development area. Reservoir fluid properties were analyzed. Based on PSD variation and current design criteria in the industry, several seamed slotted-liner configurations were proposed as an alternative completion for testing. Later, a series of large-scale Sand Retention Tests (SRTs) were performed to assess the selected alternatives under typical field production conditions. Effects of aperture size and open to flow area (OFA) were investigated to evaluate flow and sand control performance. This investigation started by a detailed study of the PSD, particle shape variation and composition of fines in the development area. The PSDs were then classified into four distinct minor and major sand facies, ranging from medium to very coarse sand with different fines content. Further investigations have shown that current design is only suitable for a limited number of PSDs, while the overall PSD classes indicate requirement of wider slot aperture sizes. The results of the SRTs indicated that the flow performance of the screen is mainly controlled by the slot aperture. Choosing the optimized aperture size avoids unacceptable sanding even for the multiphase flow scenarios with gas. Results also indicated that by increasing the aperture size and application of the seamed slots for the studied formation, plugging could be mitigated. Finally, a detailed Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was conducted to compare the mechanical integrity of the current slotted liner design and the optimized design obtained from the experimental testing. A comprehensive sand control design workflow for cold primary heavy oil production in horizontal wells is presented in this work. The current study is one of the first that investigates and compares conventional straight slotted liners with seamed slotted liners at larger scale for a field. Moreover, this study helps to better understand the effect of design parameters of seamed slotted liners on sand control, flow performance and mechanical strength.
Summary Designing and selecting the proper sand control mechanism for horizontal wells in unconsolidated heavy-oil reservoirs tend to be underlooked in some cases. Standalone completions pose some sand control challenges, which could jeopardize the oil production or even lead to critical problems. Massive sand production, screen/formation plugging, hot spots, and mechanical integrity failures are some of the well-known issues. This study attempts to optimize the slotted liner design for horizontal wells in a heavy-oil field in Colombia. A careful selection of representative core data was made to study the variation of sand particle-size distribution (PSD) within the development area. Reservoir fluid properties were analyzed. Based on PSD variation and current design criteria in the industry, several seamed slotted-liner configurations were proposed as an alternative completion for testing. Later, a series of large-scale sand retention tests (SRTs) were performed to assess the selected alternatives under typical field production conditions. The effects of aperture size and open-to-flow area were investigated to evaluate flow and sand control performance. This investigation started with a detailed study of the PSD, particle shape variation, and composition of fines in the development area. The PSD then classified into four distinct minor and major sand facies, ranging from medium to very coarse sand with different fines content. Further investigations have shown that current design is only suitable for a limited number of the PSDs, while the overall PSD classes indicate the requirement for wider slot aperture sizes. The results of the SRTs indicated that the flow performance of the screen is mainly controlled by the slot aperture. Choosing the optimized aperture size avoids unacceptable sanding even for the multiphase flow scenarios with gas. Results also indicated that by increasing the aperture size and application of the seamed slots for the studied formation, plugging could be mitigated. A comprehensive sand control design workflow for cold primary heavy-oil production in horizontal wells is presented in this work. The current study is one of the first that investigates and compares conventional straight slotted liners with seamed slotted liners at a larger scale for this field. Moreover, this study helps to better understand the effect of design parameters of seamed slotted liners on sand control, flow performance, and plugging tendency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.