2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Intersection Management over Continuous Space: A Microscopic and Precise Solution via Computational Optimal Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first benchmark is the conflict-point-reservation approach in [7], where each CAV calculates its own trajectory by jointly minimising the travelling time and energy consumption and stores its reservation time for each conflict point in a coordinator. The second benchmark is the lane-free method proposed by [5]. This work calculates the control inputs for a fixed final time, however, there is no reservation of conflict points and the CAVs can freely use all the space of the junction, as long as there is no collision.…”
Section: Test Scenario One: Comparison To the State-of-theartmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The first benchmark is the conflict-point-reservation approach in [7], where each CAV calculates its own trajectory by jointly minimising the travelling time and energy consumption and stores its reservation time for each conflict point in a coordinator. The second benchmark is the lane-free method proposed by [5]. This work calculates the control inputs for a fixed final time, however, there is no reservation of conflict points and the CAVs can freely use all the space of the junction, as long as there is no collision.…”
Section: Test Scenario One: Comparison To the State-of-theartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in Table 2 show that the proposed strategy improves the crossing time of CAVs by, respectively, up to 65% (and an average improvement of 52% for different number of CAVs), and 54% as compared to the reservation-based approach in [7] and lane-free method in [5]. Moreover, the average speed of CAVs by the proposed algorithm is larger (for larger number of crossing CAVs) and the standard deviation of speeds are smaller than the ones by the reservation-based method.…”
Section: Test Scenario One: Comparison To the State-of-theartmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations