2016
DOI: 10.18261/issn.0805-9535-2016-03-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous journalists and anonymous politicians? - Norwegian media coverage of the NSA surveillance and the «Snowden Affair»

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, coverage of surveillance usually conveyed two competing stances -supportive or critical -with slight (Barnard-Wills, 2011) or definite (Kroener, 2013;McCahill, 2014) predominance of the supportive stance. Far fewer studies found the critical stance to be slightly (Marciano, 2019b) or significantly more predominant (Eide and Lånkan, 2016). Second, media coverage of surveillance practices and policies tended to be superficial (Lischka, 2017), generally overlooking the profound social and ethical implications of these practices (Kroener, 2013) while decontextualizing them through episodic rather than thematic framing (Greenberg and Hier, 2009).…”
Section: Media Coverage Of Surveillance: Superficial Supportive and Episodicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, coverage of surveillance usually conveyed two competing stances -supportive or critical -with slight (Barnard-Wills, 2011) or definite (Kroener, 2013;McCahill, 2014) predominance of the supportive stance. Far fewer studies found the critical stance to be slightly (Marciano, 2019b) or significantly more predominant (Eide and Lånkan, 2016). Second, media coverage of surveillance practices and policies tended to be superficial (Lischka, 2017), generally overlooking the profound social and ethical implications of these practices (Kroener, 2013) while decontextualizing them through episodic rather than thematic framing (Greenberg and Hier, 2009).…”
Section: Media Coverage Of Surveillance: Superficial Supportive and Episodicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edward Snowden’s 2013 leak of classified information from the US National Security Agency emerged as a significant juncture in this development: prior to this, only a few studies had examined media representations of surveillance (Barnard-Wills, 2011; Greenberg and Hier, 2009); the majority were published afterwards. Most of these studies focused on UK media (Barnard-Wills, 2011; Branum and Charteris-Black, 2015; Kroener, 2013; Lischka, 2017; Salter, 2015; Wahl-Jorgensen et al, 2017), and several examined coverage in other countries such as New Zealand (Kuehn, 2018), Norway (Eide and Lånkan, 2016), Finland (Tiainen, 2017), and Germany (Möllers and Hälterlein, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication and surveillance scholars have been studying media coverage of surveillance in the past two decades. Most of these studies focused on United Kingdom media ( Barnard-Wills, 2011 ; Kroener, 2013 ; Lischka, 2017 ; Wahl-Jorgensen et al, 2017 ), while several others examined coverage in other countries such as Finland ( Tiainen, 2017 ), Norway ( Eide & Lånkan, 2016 ), New Zealand ( Kuehn, 2018 ), Germany ( Möllers & Hälterlein, 2013 ), and Israel ( Marciano, 2019 ). This global map is particularly important for the international scape, which positions Israel’s surveillance in relation to other countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/06/12/heres-everything-we-know-about-prism-to-date/?utm_term=.a6903843234b Accessed 14.07.2018 that the Norwegian government pressures the U.S. on these issues. This does not seem to be the case, and politicians have in general been reluctant to take part in public discussions of the Snowden revelations (Eide & Lånkan, 2016).…”
Section: Source Protection -For Whom?mentioning
confidence: 99%