Micro-and nano-motors are emerging as novel drug delivery platforms, offering advantages such as rapid drug transport, high tissue penetration and motion controllability. They can be propelled and/or guided by endogenous (i.e., chemotaxis) or exogenous stimuli (e.g., ultrasound, magnetic fields, light) toward the area of interest. Moreover, such stimuli can be used to trigger the release of a therapeutic payload when the motor reaches certain location in order to improve the drug targeting. In this review article, we highlight medically oriented micro-/nano-motors, in particular the ones created for targeted drug delivery, and discuss their current limitations and possibilities toward in vivo applications. Drug-delivery systems have greatly evolved since 1952, when the first sustained release systems were introduced (see the graphical abstract) [1]. In the 1980s, self-regulated drug release carriers as well as the first drug delivery nanostructures were developed. From then on, research in this field has been focused on improving the targeting and systemic circulation of those carriers as well as to study different nanoparticle-based drug formulations, topics which have been widely reviewed in the literature [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Several nanocarriers (between 5 and 200 nm diameter) have been explored for therapy (e.g. inorganic, polymeric, liposomes, nanocrystals, nanotubes and dendrimers) [8], many of them already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat, for example, neurovascular diseases, neurological cancers and neurodegenerative maladies [9]. The study of their pharmacokinetics has led to the creation of new carriers with reduced drug dose and protection from efflux or degradation [10]. Most of these nanocarriers include sophisticated surface biofunctionalization and coatings like polyethylene glycol (PEG) [11] or biomimetic modifications, [12] to increase their specificity and circulation time [13]. However, challenges still remain for those carriers such as the improvement of their targeting (currently only about 0.7% -median -of the administrated nanoparticle dose is found to be delivered to a solid tumor [14]), their penetration ability, drug loading capacity and delivery on the subcellular level. Other type of drug carriers are the cellular ones, which have many advantages such
Graphical abstract: