2011 16th International Conference on Methods &Amp; Models in Automation &Amp; Robotics 2011
DOI: 10.1109/mmar.2011.6031375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous navigation among large number of nearby landmarks using FastSLAM and EKF-SLAM - A comparative study

Abstract: This paper compares two commonly used algorithms to solve Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem in order to safely navigate an outdoor autonomous robot in an unknown location and without any access to a priori map. EKF-SLAM is considered as a classical method to solve SLAM problem. This method, however, suffers from two major issues; the quadratic computational complexity and single hypothesis data association. Large number of landmarks in the environment, especially, nearby landmarks, causes ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from its implementation in SLAM, particle filters are also synonymous in path finding and searching methods for various other systems [23] [25]. FastSLAM was considered to be the first to model the non-linear processes and does not require Gaussian pose distribution in its method [3] [15]. However, the map does have its own set of independent Gaussians.…”
Section: Fast Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from its implementation in SLAM, particle filters are also synonymous in path finding and searching methods for various other systems [23] [25]. FastSLAM was considered to be the first to model the non-linear processes and does not require Gaussian pose distribution in its method [3] [15]. However, the map does have its own set of independent Gaussians.…”
Section: Fast Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35], başlangıçtan günümüze EZKH çalışmaları üzerine tarama ve analizler yapmış, Monjazeb vd. [36] ise EKF ve Fast SLAM performanslarını karşılaştırmış, Rigatos [37] Araç modeli EZKH problemi için önem teşkil etmekte olup burada diferansiyel sürücü sistemli mobil iki tekerlekli bir robot kullanılmış ve denklemleri araç kinamatiği açısından ele alınmıştır. Aracın konumu Şekil 2'de gösterildiği gibi robot üzerinde hareket merkezi ve platform ağırlık merkezi aynı noktada olan bir düzlemde 3 serbestlik dereceli (x,y,θ) koordinatları ile tanımlanır [44].…”
Section: öNceki çAlışmalarunclassified
“…The samples are propagated through the high non-linearity of the system and more accurately approximate posterior belief of the robot to the second order Taylor series expansion. The approximation using UKF is more accurate compare to EKF which employs first order of Taylor series expansion specifically when motion and observation models are highly non-linear [7]. In UKF, sigma points (minimal set of sample points) around the mean are used in a deterministic sampling technique called unscented Transform [8].…”
Section: Unscented Hybridslammentioning
confidence: 99%