2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-022-00777-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous scanning probe microscopy investigations over WS2 and Au{111}

Abstract: Individual atomic defects in 2D materials impact their macroscopic functionality. Correlating the interplay is challenging, however, intelligent hyperspectral scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) mapping provides a feasible solution to this technically difficult and time consuming problem. Here, dense spectroscopic volume is collected autonomously via Gaussian process regression, where convolutional neural networks are used in tandem for spectral identification. Acquired data enable defect segmentation, and a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach links strongly to the developing DL methods applied to data challenges in Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) [30][31][32][33]. In particular, the success of deep learning Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [34] in image recognition tasks has led to their application to the analysis of SPM images [35], especially in the context of molecular/surface feature/defect characterisation [36][37][38][39][40][41], scanning-probe characterisation [42,43], and techniques for autonomously-driven SPM [44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our approach links strongly to the developing DL methods applied to data challenges in Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) [30][31][32][33]. In particular, the success of deep learning Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [34] in image recognition tasks has led to their application to the analysis of SPM images [35], especially in the context of molecular/surface feature/defect characterisation [36][37][38][39][40][41], scanning-probe characterisation [42,43], and techniques for autonomously-driven SPM [44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In order to better investigate the physics of the MTB bandgap formed in WS 2 , we make use of both point STS and differential conductance mapping, which are powerful tools for screening defects. 28,37,47 Electronic band-edge state differential conductance maps, acquired by dI/dV imaging (Fig. 2 (a-f)), at the LUS (ψ − ) and the HOS (ψ + ) are spatially out-of-phase for the SMTB case, and are a spatially in-phase for an AMGB.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better investigate the physics of the MTB bandgap formed in WS 2 , we make use of both point STS and differential conductance mapping, which are powerful tools for screening defects. 28,37,47 Electronic band-edge state differential conductance maps, acquired by dI/dV imaging (Fig. 2 (a-f)), at the LUS (ψ − ) and the HOS (ψ + ) are spatially out-of-phase for the SMTB case, and are a spatially in-phase for an AMGB.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%