2002
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2002.1493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Structural Health Monitoring—part Ii: Vibration-Based in-Operation Damage Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where L is the differential operator and N (k) is the matrix of shape functions for element k. Using Equation (8), the following equation is obtained under modal coordinates:…”
Section: X(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where L is the differential operator and N (k) is the matrix of shape functions for element k. Using Equation (8), the following equation is obtained under modal coordinates:…”
Section: X(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the increasing complexity and high reliability demand of those systems, damage and system performance degradation need to be quantified accurately for maintenance purposes [5,6]. To monitor the status of a target system, measurements of system condition variables are taken either by sensors installed on the system or field non-destructive inspections [7][8][9]. In particular, using smart sensors for structural health monitoring has drawn a lot of attention in the SHM community due to flexibility of smart sensors and advances in composite materials [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal loads introduce stresses due to thermal expansion, which lead to changes in the modal properties. Thermal loads can also cause buckling and in some cases even lead to chaotic behaviour [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline of these techniques utiHze iterative algorithms to identify differences either in the stifi&iess matrix or in the flexibility matrix prior to and following damage. A review of these health monitoring methods can be found in reference [1] while some interesting results along with some generic issues and limitations are found in reference [2]. The lipiiting issues of all these techniques are related to the iterative algorithm and its numerical error that can overtake the small differences obtained between the update matrices and the baseline and thereby lowering the method sensitivity to damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%