2013
DOI: 10.1038/nature12802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomously stabilized entanglement between two superconducting quantum bits

Abstract: Quantum error-correction codes would protect an arbitrary state of a multi-qubit register against decoherence-induced errors 1 , but their implementation is an outstanding challenge for the development of large-scale quantum computers. A first step is to stabilize a nonequilibrium state of a simple quantum system such as a qubit or a cavity mode in the presence of decoherence. Several groups have recently accomplished this goal using measurementbased feedback schemes [2][3][4][5] . A next step is to prepare an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
352
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
352
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is, in principle, impossible to have a steady state where the mechanical motion is squeezed below one half of the zero-point level using only parametric driving. These limitations may be overcome by combining continuous quantum measurement and feedback [9][10][11][12], but it would substantially increase the experimental complexity.Another method to generate a robust quantum state is quantum reservoir engineering [13], which has been used to generate quantum squeezed states and entanglement with trapped ions [14,15] and superconducting qubits [16]. It can also be applied to an optomechanical system to generate strong steady-state squeezing without quantumlimited measurement and feedback [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is, in principle, impossible to have a steady state where the mechanical motion is squeezed below one half of the zero-point level using only parametric driving. These limitations may be overcome by combining continuous quantum measurement and feedback [9][10][11][12], but it would substantially increase the experimental complexity.Another method to generate a robust quantum state is quantum reservoir engineering [13], which has been used to generate quantum squeezed states and entanglement with trapped ions [14,15] and superconducting qubits [16]. It can also be applied to an optomechanical system to generate strong steady-state squeezing without quantumlimited measurement and feedback [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method to generate a robust quantum state is quantum reservoir engineering [13], which has been used to generate quantum squeezed states and entanglement with trapped ions [14,15] and superconducting qubits [16]. It can also be applied to an optomechanical system to generate strong steady-state squeezing without quantumlimited measurement and feedback [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The engineered symmetries in our system distinguish it from the two-qubit bath engineering experiment in Ref. [13], where cooling to |S is achieved by utilizing far-detuned qubits in a single cavity; stabilizing entanglement in this system required six microwave drives, and only |S was accessible. In our implementation, the resonant construction of the photonic lattice imprints itself onto the effective qubit Hamiltonian and lifts the degeneracy in the single-excitation subspace.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An alternate approach, quantum bath engineering [8][9][10][11], explicitly utilizes this coupling in conjunction with microwave drives, to modify the dissipative environment and dynamically cool to a desired quantum state. Bath engineering in superconducting qubits has resulted in the stabilization of a single qubit on the Bloch sphere [12], a Bell-state of two qubits housed in the same cavity [13], many-body states [14], and a variety of non-classical resonator states [15,16]. Additionally, theoretical proposals have been put forward for dissipative error correction [17][18][19] and ultimately a universal quantum computation [20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QRE does not require an external feedback with calculation since the Hamiltonian interactions are designed a priori to determine the final state avoiding uncertainty induced by the quantum-classical interface. In addition, QRE is less susceptible to experimental noise [14] and in some cases thrives in a noisy environment [15].QRE has been demonstrated in macroscopic atomic ensembles [16], trapped atomic systems [17], and superconducting circuits [18][19][20]. Circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED) systems are an attractive platform for QRE due to the experimental freedom to design strong interactions between superconducting qubits and microwave cavities [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%