2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomy Benefits and Risks of Assistive Technologies for Persons With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Abstract: This paper explores the ways in which assistive technologies (ATs) can both promote and undermine the autonomy of Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (PIDD). Following an initial discussion of ATs for PIDD, I examine the specific issues of autonomy for PIDD. I outline the ways in which ATs can boost autonomy, of PIDD, focusing on knowledge, authenticity, and liberty. Following that I suggest that ATs are not necessarily beneficial in terms of autonomy and examine ways that they might be us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPRS (2018) highlighted the various legal aspects relating to assistive technology, in the context of European Union law, which covered competence, the lack of a generally accepted definition, and the variety of hazards posed by such technology in terms of human rights, dignity, privacy, freedom, and the social inclusion of individuals with disabilities. For example, it is vital to consider an individual’s freedom, values, and choices when using assistive technology (O’Brolcháin, 2018), balancing the right to accessibility and individual privacy, and taking into consideration access to sensitive personal information, developing an informed consent process, considering a user-centered model of technology design, and ensuring that tools are safe (EPRS, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPRS (2018) highlighted the various legal aspects relating to assistive technology, in the context of European Union law, which covered competence, the lack of a generally accepted definition, and the variety of hazards posed by such technology in terms of human rights, dignity, privacy, freedom, and the social inclusion of individuals with disabilities. For example, it is vital to consider an individual’s freedom, values, and choices when using assistive technology (O’Brolcháin, 2018), balancing the right to accessibility and individual privacy, and taking into consideration access to sensitive personal information, developing an informed consent process, considering a user-centered model of technology design, and ensuring that tools are safe (EPRS, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing XR-based interventions, and more broadly assistive technologies for individuals with ID, O'Brolcháin [56] emphasizes the importance of individuals making choices according to their own individual preferences. In line with this, we found that two studies identified the need to create scenarios with multiple configurations, adapted to the specific needs of each individual [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with disabilities are at high risk of experiencing healthcare and employment barriers, depression, anxiety, , distress, , and even danger from their medical conditions. Furthermore, by 2050, approximately 22% of the world’s population will be over 60 years old, creating a new global challenge for healthcare systems . As a practical tool for aiding those with disabilities engage in social life, assistive physical therapy (APT) devices play a critical role in their daily lives. Assistive physical therapy devices are adaptive and rehabilitative devices that are designed to mitigate the effects of disabilities in performing tasks such as cognition, , communication, , literacy, , and mobility; , these devices can take different forms, including accessories or implants. Because individuals display unique health profiles by virtue of their varying family medical histories, lifestyles, and genetics, providing assistive services depends on practical, sensor-acquired data analysis. Challenges in creating APT devices thus far largely stem from the demand for a diversified application market for more advanced functionality and portability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%