In this paper John White argues that there has been a decline in interest in and support for liberalism in British philosophy of education. He provides examples of work by leading figures in the field that demonstrates scepticism about the key liberal value of autonomy, and offers an analysis of new influences in the field that have contributed to this decline. In particular he notes the increase of work from a religious perspective. Doubts are expressed about the practical relevance to education of some of these avenues of thought, and the suggestion is made that they cause those within the field to be more out of touch with society at large, in which liberal values have continued to be the major source of animation. The paper is followed by short responses from four philosophers of education whose work he criticises.Am I wrong or is liberalism increasingly out of favour in British philosophy of education? How many in the younger generation-say among the under-60-are still attached to it?Liberalism has animated progressive British politics since the midnineteenth century and is today the dominant view on the centre and left. If, as I shall claim, liberal ideas are in decline in our field, the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain and its Journal (JOPE) are likely to have less and less to contribute to practical educational reform in this and other countries. I A core liberal value is personal autonomy. An autonomous person is one who determines how he or she should live according to their own, unpressured, picture of a worthwhile life. But autonomy on its own is not enough. A tyrant might also value this, but only for himself, just as a certain sort of élitist might think autonomy fine for the upper classes to which she belongs, but not for the common people. A liberal makes no such discriminations among persons: personal autonomy is a good applicable to all. Equality of consideration is, therefore, a second core liberal value.